随着 meme 币的法律压力不断加大，第二起诉讼也席卷了 Pump.fun

在该项目宣布新的合作伙伴关系和交易所上市后，ai16Z 已从近期的低迷中恢复过来。 1 月 22 日，agentic AI 项目 ai16z 的原生代币 ai16Z 上涨 44%，盘中最高达到 1.25 美元，截至本文撰写时，其市值超过 13.5 亿美元。价格上涨伴随着交易活动的增加，其日交易量增长 28.8%，达到近 5 亿美元。 此次上涨是由于期货市场对该代币的需求增加。根据 CoinGlass 的数据，AI16Z 期货市场的未平仓合约在过去一天内上涨了 33%，达到 2.13 亿美元以上。 最近几天，随着 AI16Z 在多家交易所上市，投资者对它的兴趣激增。1 月 22 日，Kraken Pro 将这款山寨币添加到其永续期货市场，为交易者提供杠杆头寸。就在几天前，即 1 月 20 日，去中心化交易平台 dYdX 也上市了这款代币，进一步扩大了其市场覆盖范围。 一些值得注意的合作伙伴关系也支持了最近的反弹。 ai16z（AI16Z）于 1 月 21 日与分散式基础设施建设者 Hyperbolic 合作，利用其可扩展的计算市场和可验证的推理服务以及其代理创建工具包来提高其 AI 操作系统 ElizaOS 上部署的 AI 代理的功能。 你可能还喜欢：Marc Andreessen 讨论 DOGE；AI16Z 的 Eliza 将进行重大更新 ElizaOS 还集成到了去中心化交易应用程序 Bebop 中，这将允许在 ElizaOS 上开发的 AI 代理进行更高效的交易。 此类发展通常受到项目社区的欢迎，因为它们增强了平台的整体性能。 根据 Nansen 的数据，聪明钱投资者的兴趣日益浓厚，表明人们对该项目的乐观情绪日益高涨，过去 24 小时内他们已经积累了价值约 79 万美元的 AI16Z 代币。 分析师预计涨势将持续 匿名交易员 CryptoBull 认为，山寨币可能从最近测试的 0.80 美元左右的支撑区域上涨 75%。 https://twitter.com/CryptoBull_360/status/1881755442306847222 分析师阿里·马丁内斯 (Ali Martinez) 此前曾预测过更高的目标，他在 1 月 16 日的 X 帖子中指出，AI16Z 在自 12 月底以来形成的上升平行通道内交易。他还指出 0.80 美元是关键支撑位。 AI16Z 最近从 1 月 20 日的 0.80 美元水平反弹，确认了该水平的强劲支撑。马丁内斯预计，只要 AI16Z 在未来几周继续在上升通道内交易，该股就有可能上涨至 2.60 美元，较当前价格上涨 113%。 AI16Z 价格和 50 天 EMA 图表 - 1 月 22 日 | 来源：crypto.news 技术指标也支持看涨预测。在 1 天 AI16Z/USDT 图表上，AI16Z 的价格位于 50 天指数移动平均线上方，表明多头继续保持力量。 AI16Z 超级趋势和 RSI 图表 â 1 月 22 日 |来源：crypto.news 根据相对强弱指数指标，价格尚未达到超买水平。截至发稿时，RSI 为 49，高于 70 的水平被视为超买区域。这意味着如果趋势强度保持不变，山寨币的涨势可以进一步延续。 不过，浮动在价格上方的超级趋势线表明 AI16Z 在继续上涨之前可能会下跌。 阅读更多：这就是为什么 ai16Z 今天飙升超过 35% 披露：本文不代表投资建议。本页内容和材料仅供教育之用。

随着链上活跃地址数量的增加，Polygon 的价格在过去几天有所回升。 Polygon (POL) 盘中一度升至 0.2460 美元的高点，为 3 月 9 日以来的最高水平，比历史最低点高出 24%。目前仍比去年 11 月的峰值低约 70%。 Polygon 的反弹主要是因为比特币（BTC）和许多其他山寨币，如 Solana（SOL）和币安币（BNB）在过去几天出现反弹。 这也与链上活动的增长相吻合。据 Nansen 称，过去七天里，网络上的活跃地址数量增长了 13%，达到 234 万。交易量也小幅上升至 2070 万。 DeFi Llama 的其他数据显示，Polygon 的去中心化金融生态系统出现了稳定的迹象。上周，该网络锁定的总价值上涨了 5.7%，达到 7.19 亿美元。桥接 TVL 增加到超过 46.4 亿美元，而生态系统中的稳定币总额攀升至近 20 亿美元。 你可能还喜欢：Pi Network 价格暴跌加剧：Pi 币能否反弹？ TVL 增长的很大一部分来自 Quickswap，其每周 TVL 飙升 577%，达到 1.038 亿美元。其他去中心化应用程序（例如 Morpho Blue、Aura 和 KlimaDAO）最近几天也出现了显着的资金流入。 然而，随着第二层领域的竞争愈演愈烈，Polygon 仍面临挑战。尽管近期有所增长，但其 TVL 仍远低于近 100 亿美元的历史最高水平。 Base 和 Arbitrum 等第 2 层区块链在 DeFi TVL、NFT 交易量和去中心化交易所交易量方面已经超过了 Polygon。例如，DeFi Llama 数据显示，Polygon DeX 网络在过去 30 天内仅处理了 30 亿美元，而 Arbitrum 和 Base 分别处理了 230 亿美元和 210 亿美元。 多边形价格分析 POL price chart | Source: crypto.news The daily chart shows that the POL price peaked at $0.7687 after its conversion from MATIC and then crashed to a low of $0.1900 this month. The coin has formed a bullish divergence pattern as the Relative Strength Index and the MACD indicator have pointed upwards.  The coin has also moved above the upper side of the falling wedge pattern. A wedge is seen as one of the most popular bullish reversal patterns in technical analysis. As such, Polygon’s price is likely to continue climbing, with bulls eyeing a retest of the key resistance at $0.2854, the lowest level from Nov. 4. A drop below the support at $0.1901 would invalidate this bullish outlook. 你可能还喜欢：XRP 顶住市场低迷，逼近加密货币前三名

How are analysts interpreting Bitcoin’s $97K consolidation against rising global debt maturity, ETF flow trends, and the uncertain direction of interest rates in the second half of the year? Table of ContentsCrypto mirrors the tension but charts its own pathGlobal trade system under pressureETF flows mask deeper trendsNo past model fits this cycleMarket awaits a catalyst Crypto mirrors the tension but charts its own path The mood across global financial markets has turned visibly tense. What began as a focused concern around central bank decisions has morphed into a broader wave of uncertainty, shaped by conflicting macro indicators, uneven growth data, and investor hesitation.  The reintroduction of U.S. tariffs under President Donald Trump’s administration has added another layer of friction. A particularly bold move, such as the 100% tariff on foreign films, has not only reignited trade war concerns but also signaled a shift back to protectionist rhetoric.  For investors who had grown accustomed to relative trade stability, this has raised new questions about supply chains, international cooperation, and the policy outlook heading into the second half of the year. Markets have already reacted. The S&P 500, which had gained steadily over the past few days, broke its streak as investors pulled back amid deteriorating macro signals.  In contrast, traditional safe-haven assets have seen rising inflows. Gold prices have edged upward, and Treasuries have gained traction again, a move often associated with risk aversion during economic softness.  Notably, the most recent GDP print disappointed expectations, while inflation has remained sticky around 3%, leaving the Federal Reserve in a difficult spot.  Rate cuts appear unlikely during Fed’s May 7 meeting, yet the tightening already in place may not be enough to shield against stagnation. Fed will announce its interest rate decision today.Markets pricing in a 95% probability that rates will be held steady pic.twitter.com/M0ZVOfQTZz— LANGERIUS (@langeriuseth) May 7, 2025 Jobless claims have begun ticking upward, and April’s CPI figures reflected consumer pressure that’s still far from easing.  The Treasury market’s absorption of a $42 billion 10-year bond sale is a notable development. It suggests institutional investors are repositioning for longer-term safety, likely preparing for potential policy missteps or a downturn that could surface without much warning. Amid all this, the crypto market has found itself responding with its own brand of volatility. Bitcoin (BTC) reached an all-time high of nearly $109,000 in January, driven by ETF optimism, institutional inflows, and the broader narrative of crypto as a macro hedge.  But it wasn’t built on solid ground. Over the months that followed, BTC lost nearly 30% of its value before clawing back to around $97,000 as of this writing on May 7.  BTC price chart | Source: crypto.news BTC still remains a strong asset in terms of performance year-to-date, but the erratic price swings have forced both retail and institutional players to reassess their strategies. Let’s explore how current macroeconomic pressures, including recession risks, trade tensions, and monetary ambiguity are shaping investor behavior and what the coming months may hold for the crypto market. Global trade system under pressure A growing sense of macroeconomic fragility is beginning to shape investor expectations across asset classes. J.P. Morgan has placed the probability of a U.S. recession in 2025 at 60%, reflecting heightened concern over the systemic strain within the financial ecosystem. Treasury markets continue to flash warning signs. The inversion of the 10-year and 3-month yield curve remains persistent, a traditional signal of recession risk.  Compounding the situation is the approaching maturity of over $6.5 trillion in the U.S. Treasury debt, a volume that could pressure liquidity and challenge the government’s refinancing capabilities in an already uncertain interest rate environment. Charlie Hu, co-founder of Bitlayer, views this convergence of rising debt obligations and monetary policy uncertainty as a pivotal fault line in global capital markets. “There are approximately $6.5 trillion USD worth of Treasury bonds approaching maturity in the coming months. The economic slowdown is putting pressure on the Fed’s interest rate and monetary policy decisions.” He adds that a prolonged period of elevated rates, coupled with the urgency to refinance, could rattle investor confidence. “If the market continues to experience high interest rates alongside a large volume of maturing debt that needs refinancing, the U.S. government will be forced to address the situation carefully — striking a balance between managing high inflation and high debt levels, the two biggest metrics influencing capital flow and investor behavior in global markets.” This mounting pressure extends beyond the U.S. economy. The International Monetary Fund has issued repeated warnings about trade protectionism and retaliatory tariffs, labeling them as headwinds for global growth.  Recent policy actions have disrupted established supply chains, slowing cross-border trade and weakening the short-term outlook for export-heavy economies. Amid these developments, the divergence between economic systems and behavioral responses has become more visible. Christian, founder of Infini, believes the disconnect is structural rather than cyclical. “We’re seeing three core dislocations: one, the cost of capital has reset higher but consumer and government behaviors haven’t fully adjusted. Two, global supply chains are attempting to regionalize under nationalist pressures, yet our systems are still priced for globalization. And three, fiat confidence is eroding slowly, but the alternatives, digital or commodity-backed systems, haven’t matured enough to absorb that flow.” Parallel concerns are surfacing around liquidity vulnerabilities. Tracy Jin, COO at MEXC, points to emerging fragilities in the bond market that could seep into broader risk asset pricing, including crypto. “We’re closely monitoring a synchronized bond sell-off across US and emerging markets, especially the ones triggered by either sticky inflation or a fiscal credibility crisis.” She notes that such scenarios, if left unchecked, could lead to a contraction in global liquidity and reduce the appetite for speculative assets. ETF flows mask deeper trends While traditional markets continue to react to inflation prints and central bank guidance, the crypto market is digesting a different cocktail, one that blends rising institutional interest with noticeable retail hesitation.  The gap between these investor classes is becoming increasingly evident, especially when viewed through the lens of ETF participation, derivatives trends, and sentiment data. The Crypto Fear & Greed Index fell into “Extreme Fear” territory in April, typically a bearish signal. Yet Bitcoin defied this mood and climbed back toward $98,000.  This dissonance between sentiment and price has puzzled retail investors but, according to Jin, can largely be explained by the nature of capital flows. “As Bitcoin approached $96,000, it underscores the bifurcation between sentiment and capital flows. ETF inflows from institutional channels have been a powerful counterforce to retail anxiety.” She believes that much of the current turbulence is driven externally rather than from within the crypto ecosystem. “We estimate that 60% of the current volatility can be accounted for by macro uncertainty, central bank ambiguity, and geopolitical risks. The rest can be accounted for from crypto-native elements, including miner capitulation post-halving and leveraged positioning in altcoins.” The mechanics of ETF flows themselves have added to the confusion. Greco argues that ETF activity tends to reflect market moves rather than anticipate them, often introducing a timing lag that distorts real-time analysis. “ETFs tend to mirror the broader market trend. During sharp declines, we typically see outflows, while strong rallies attract inflows. Many ETF products settle on a T+1 basis, meaning the reported flows usually correspond to the previous day’s activity.” From his perspective, institutional flows act more as accelerators of existing direction rather than as early indicators of reversal or breakout. Retail behavior, meanwhile, remains deeply reactive. Michael Cameron of Vanilla Finance highlights how crypto’s unique structure amplifies volatility during uncertain macro periods. “Crypto’s high liquidity makes it a prime target for rapid sell-offs during economic stress. Unlike real estate or bonds, cryptocurrencies can be sold instantly on exchanges, amplifying downward price movements. Whales are buying dips, and a dovish FED or softer CPI could spark a rebound.” Across the board, investors are parsing mixed signals. Institutional inflows may stabilize markets temporarily, but without clearer macro direction, both camps remain on edge, interpreting every data point, Fed speech, or CPI surprise as a possible turning point. No past model fits this cycle As recession probabilities rise and market uncertainty deepens, the question resurfaces, is crypto still a hedge, or has it been absorbed into the broader risk asset complex? Jin believes Bitcoin’s growing institutional base may support a more nuanced response than a simple correlation or detachment from traditional markets. “Bitcoin’s leverage lies in its maturing investor base, especially institutional participants via ETFs. As they could offer a partial buffer, we may see a nuanced decoupling. Broader equities could suffer a sharp pullback but Bitcoin could act less like a tech stock and more like a high-volatility hedge, especially if rate cut expectations increase.” While that interpretation allows for divergence under certain macro scenarios, others remain doubtful of a clean break. Greco points to the increasing overlap between crypto and traditional finance, driven by institutional adoption, as evidence that both systems are now deeply intertwined. “The general macro trends are usually similar. What really differs is the magnitude of the price swings between traditional finance and crypto, with the latter obviously experiencing much higher volatility in moments of high uncertainty. Looking at the past data point and the increasing commingling between the two markets, it looks unlikely that one sector might have a completely different pattern to the other.” Some argue that the framing of recession itself needs to be rethought. Christian suggests that Bitcoin should not be viewed as a counter-cyclical hedge, but rather as a monetary alternative built to respond to systemic failure. “A recession, in traditional terms, is a lagging indicator. But in first-principles terms, a recession is just a large-scale mispricing of risk and value, corrected through forced rebalancing. Bitcoin is what happens when a system opts out. It doesn’t need a soft landing — it is the hard alternative.” That framework gains sharper relevance when viewed through the lens of geopolitical shocks and prolonged policy failure. Cameron stresses that while Bitcoin may gain in the long term from failed monetary policy, it is not insulated from short-term market trauma. “The brief 2020 COVID recession saw crypto recover quickly due to stimulus and low rates, but a deeper, tariff-driven ‘Trumpcession’ could be different. Crypto has never endured a prolonged US recession since Bitcoin’s inception in 2009.” Market awaits a catalyst With the global macro backdrop still clouded by inflation, debt concerns, and geopolitical risk, market participants are shifting toward short-term caution while keeping one eye on longer-term opportunities.  Bitcoin has rallied nearly 25% over the past month, largely driven by institutional spot buying and ETF inflows. However, early signs of fatigue are beginning to show.  According to 10x Research, the Coinbase premium has dropped and funding rates have weakened, suggesting that momentum may be slowing.  The report notes that Bitcoin is now consolidating near the $95,000 level, with traders awaiting clearer signals from the Federal Reserve’s upcoming decisions. “This is not a time for blind risk-taking but tactical positioning with well-defined exposure,” the research states, advising investors to consider hedging strategies as volatility creeps back in. Cameron believes that while short-term weakness remains a concern, structural drivers continue to support long-term growth. He sees recession fears and ETF outflows contributing to current volatility, but also points to positive underlying trends. Jin echoes that sense of cautious optimism. She expects Bitcoin to remain in a wide range as the market digests policy and liquidity signals. “Bitcoin may trade in the $88,000–$100,000 range as the market digests macro signals and ETF flow data. Our year-end target remains cautiously bullish at $128,000, with the assumption of zero black swan event.” Still, visibility remains limited. Greco describes the current price zone as crucial. “The market is currently sitting at a crucial level that could shape sentiment over the coming weeks. A decisive break above the $94,000–$95,000 range could restore confidence in a sustained bullish trend.” However, he stops short of any definitive forecast, noting that the cycle has already deviated from historical patterns. “This one has already broken precedent by reaching a new all-time high before the halving, something never seen before.” Christian suggests that the dominant market variable going forward may not be rate decisions or inflation data, but trust. “The key variable now isn’t earnings or even rates. It’s trust. Trust in sovereign debt, in fiat, in central bank forward guidance. That trust has been bleeding.” He sees Bitcoin and stablecoins as systems increasingly filling the vacuum left by waning institutional credibility. As crypto enters the next phase of its market cycle, clarity will likely hinge on central bank action, global liquidity conditions, and the durability of institutional flows. In the meantime, the market remains in a holding pattern.  Summing it all up, risk is being recalibrated, conviction is being tested, and capital is watching for the next signal to move. Amid such fragile conditions, trade wisely and never invest more than you can afford to lose.

披露：此处表达的观点和意见仅属于作者，不代表 crypto.news 编辑的观点和意见。 2014 年 Mt. Gox 倒闭，85 万比特币 (BTC) 不翼而飞，这本应是加密货币“永不复返”的时刻。该行业建立在金融主权的承诺之上，然而十年过去了，我们仍然停留在原点。 你可能还喜欢：加密钱包安全性需要重新思考 | 观点 Bybit 最近的黑客攻击导致数亿美元（可能高达 15 亿美元）的用户资金损失，成为迄今为止最大的加密货币安全漏洞之一。虽然该交易所仍在继续运营，但这次攻击暴露了一个更深层次的问题：加密货币最薄弱的环节是中心化交易所。该行业没有消除单点故障，而是不断重建它们，创建了不透明、中心化且脆弱的系统，而且规模越来越大。 加密货币本意是将用户从传统金融机构中解放出来。然而，大多数用户仍然被困在了其中，依赖于控制资金的集中交易所。这些平台就像黑匣子一样，容易受到内部操纵、数据泄露和彻底崩溃的影响——就像银行一样，但没有法律保护或监管监督。而且系统并没有崩溃。它完全按照设计运行——只是不利于用户。 但如果加密货币是传统金融的出口，为什么我们仍然依赖中间人来持有我们的资产？如果去中心化是目标，为什么交易活动集中在少数几家交易所，而这些交易所的运作方式就像加密货币本应取代的银行一样——甚至连保障措施都更少？ 加密货币重建了它本应摧毁的金融监狱 CEX 模式迫使用户将资金存入由交易所控制的集中资金池。这些资金混合在一起，与敏感的客户数据一起存储，并由单个实体管理。 这使得它们成为黑客的完美目标。问题不在于交易所是否会受到攻击，而是用户下次何时会遭受攻击以及会遭受多少损失。 尽管加密货币领域一直在讨论去中心化，但大多数交易仍然在中心化平台上进行，这些平台的外观和行为都与银行类似——只是没有存款保险、欺诈保护或监督。如果这种模式在传统金融中是不可接受的，那么为什么它在加密货币中如此普遍？ 中心化交易所存在的理由一直是它们能够提供流动性——如果没有它们，加密货币市场就会变得效率低下且支离破碎。 但代价是什么？如果交易所倒闭后流动性就消失了，那么流动性就不是真正的流动性；如果少数内部人士控制价格，市场就不会开放。如果用户在最需要资产时无法获得资产，那么所有权就毫无意义。 毕竟，如果你的资金可以被冻结，那还是金融自由吗？如果你的交易所可以抢先交易，那还是开放市场吗？如果你的资产在一夜之间因黑客攻击而消失，那还是真正的所有权吗？ Bybit 的黑客攻击再次提醒我们，加密货币行业最大的参与者受益于中心化，而不是去中心化。交易所拥有的权力越大，他们就越能决定费用、控制访问权，并从自己的流动性池中获利。 是时候纠正路线了 加密货币的下一阶段需要真正的所有权，没有障碍或中介。如果加密货币要生存，它就不能仅仅变得更加去中心化。它需要从根本上改变资产、市场和用户的互动方式。 这意味着流动性可以跨链流动，而不是锁定在 CEX 钱包中。这意味着自我托管不会牺牲可用性，因此用户不必在控制和便利之间做出选择。这意味着用户（而不是内部人员）控制价格发现的市场。 目前，该行业陷入了循环。每隔几年，就会有另一个中心化平台崩溃，抹去数十亿美元的用户资金。每次，循环都会重复，因为没有可行的退出系统的方法。如果加密货币要成为传统金融的真正替代品，它就不能依赖同样脆弱的中心化基础设施。 唯一的出路就是抛弃中心化交易所 Bybit 黑客事件应该是一个警钟。但它真的会这样吗？ 中心化交易所通过困住用户来获利。它们控制流动性，随意设定费用，并在自己的交易平台上充当做市商。只要这种情况持续下去，我们就会一次又一次地看到同样的失败。 答案不是另一个交易所、另一个中心化借贷平台或另一个重新命名的 DeFi 平台，其功能就像它声称要取代的机构一样。答案是构建用户完全不必信任中间人的基础设施。 Crypto has a choice: build an actual exit or stay trapped in the same walled gardens until the next inevitable collapse. It’s time to start building. 阅读更多：加密货币重回炒作时代，比赌场还糟糕 | 观点 拉蒙·雷库埃罗 拉蒙·雷库埃罗是 Kinto 的联合创始人兼首席执行官，Kinto 是一个模块化交易所和非托管保险钱包，旨在实现最高安全性和无缝用户体验。此前，他创立了 Babylon.finance，这是一个 DeFi 协议，资产管理规模超过 5000 万美元。在职业生涯早期，他曾在 Y Combinator 工作，负责开发产品和支持创始人。在此之前，他为 Moz、Google 和 Zynga 开发应用程序和游戏。在过去的一次创业中，他创立了 Netgamix，这是一个用户生成的琐事平台，月活跃用户增长到 10 万以上。30 岁后，他将自己的见解提炼成一本名为《Grip》的书。他还指导和辅导初创公司创始人。

Cryptocurrency prices have pulled back this week as market attention shifts to Wednesday’s Federal Reserve interest rate decision. Bitcoin (BTC) has pulled back from last week’s high of $97,000 to $93,700, while Ethereum (ETH) remains below the $2,000 level. The total market capitalization of all cryptocurrencies has slipped to $2.9 trillion, with the crypto fear and greed index stuck at a neutral point. On the positive side, assets in spot Bitcoin ETFs have surged by $5 billion in the last two weeks, signaling that there is still demand from institutional investors.  Another positive is that analysts and Polymarket traders anticipate the Fed will cut interest rates three times this year. A more dovish Fed is bullish for Bitcoin and other altcoins. Best crypto to buy now as BTC ETF inflows rise Some of the top cryptocurrencies to buy now are Polkadot (DOT), Chainlink (LINK), Uniswap (UNI), and Sonic (S). Polkadot Polkadot is one of the top contrarian cryptos to buy now as its price hovers near its all-time low. The most bullish factor is that it has found strong support at $3.82, a level it has failed to break below several times since 2023. This is a sign that it has formed a quadruple-bottom pattern with a neckline at $11.57.  DOT has also formed the harmonic XABCD pattern and is now starting the final CD wave. If this pattern plays out, the coin will likely rebound and retest the key resistance point at $12, up by almost 200% from the current level.  Polkadot also has a high staking yield of 11.5%, has high chances of seeing a spot DOT ETF, and is implementing the final stage of Polkadot 2.0 transition. DOT price chart | Source: crypto.news You might also like:Polkadot price could surge as development activity soars Chainlink  Chainlink is another top altcoin to buy because of its strong technicals and fundamentals. Fundamentally, it is the biggest oracle network in the crypto industry, connecting off-chain data to the blockchain. Its Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol is also the leading standard in the Real World Asset tokenization industry. The daily chart shows that LINK has formed a falling wedge pattern, a popular bullish reversal signal. It is also slowly forming an inverse head and shoulders pattern, with the current retreat being part of the right shoulder. Therefore, the coin will likely drop further for a while and then resume its bullish trend.  LINK price chart | Source: crypto.news Uniswap  Uniswap, the biggest decentralized exchange in crypto, is a top crypto to buy after falling 74% from its highest level in November last year. The main reasons for buying it are mostly fundamental. It is the biggest player in the DEX industry by far. It handled over $51 billion worth of transactions in the last 30 days, more than PancakeSwap’s $30 billion. Uniswap also launched Unichain, a layer-2 network that has become highly successful. Protocols in the network handled over $4.2 billion in assets in the last 30 days, flipping popular layer-1 networks like Avalanche and Cronos. Sonic Sonic, formerly known as Fantom, has become one of the fastest-growing chains in the industry. It has attracted over 69 dApps in its ecosystem, with a total value locked of over $1 billion.  Its DEX networks have handled over $784 million in the last seven days, making it the 11th biggest chain in the industry. There is a likelihood that its token will bounce back in the coming weeks since it has formed an inverse head and shoulders pattern on the four-hour chart. You might also like:Casper 2.0 launches on the mainnet, with a real world asset focus