Lazarus 黑客攻击后，Bybit ETH 储备量上升，以太坊出现波动

Strategy 创始人迈克尔·塞勒 (Michael Saylor) 在 X 上宣布，他已受邀参加 3 月 7 日由唐纳德·特朗普总统主持的白宫数字资产峰会。 塞勒在 X 的一篇帖子中分享了这一邀请。此次峰会由风险投资家和科技投资者戴维·萨克斯 (David Sacks) 主持，将汇集加密货币创始人、首席执行官、投资者和主要政策制定者，共同探讨美国数字资产的未来。 我应邀参加本周五由总统主持的白宫数字资产峰会。— Michael Saylor⚡️ (@saylor) 2025 年 3 月 4 日 此次峰会是在特朗普总统最近宣布建立数字货币战略储备之后举行的，这标志着加密货币行业在美国金融体系中的角色发生了重大转变。 你可能还喜欢：忘记 DOGE 和 SHIB：这种新的 meme 币可能会涨 1000 倍 Saylor 和比特币 Michael Saylor’s participation in the summit is notable, given his advocacy for Bitcoin (BTC) and digital assets. He recently argued that the U.S. should acquire Bitcoin as a strategic reserve, calling it the “greatest economic program of the 21st century.”  He suggested that if the U.S. owned 10–20% of the Bitcoin network, it could help pay off the national debt. 据报道，白宫加密货币峰会的嘉宾名单将比预期的要少，其中包括迈克尔·塞勒 (Michael Saylor) 等行业领袖和总统数字资产工作组的政府官员，并为未受邀参加圆桌会议的人士计划在附近举行更大规模的招待会。 你可能还喜欢：白俄罗斯政府考虑利用过剩能源供应进行加密挖矿

Tapswap 是 Telegram 上流行的点击赚钱平台，它正在为其拖延已久的代币生成活动做准备。 据 IntoTheBlock 报道，Hamster Kombat 目前的持有者不到 400 万，低于空投期间的 3 亿多。Catizen 和 Notcoin 的持有者分别有 160 万和 280 万，低于 2024 年的 4000 多万。 Tapswap 留住用户的策略是开发一款简单的基于技能的学习游戏，让 TAPS 持有者可以继续参与其中。质押元素增加了代币的实用性，激励持有者赚取被动收入。 你可能还喜欢：TapSwap 空投出现延迟，与 Pi Network 相似 空投后 TAPS 价格会上涨还是下跌？

亚利桑那州的数字资产储备法案在获得全体委员会批准后将提交众议院进行最终投票。 4月17日，亚利桑那州第1373号法案（又称《战略数字资产储备法案》）在众议院初步审查中获得批准，距离正式成为法律又近了一步。 SB 1373，也称为《战略数字资产储备法案》，提议设立一个由刑事诉讼中查获的数字资产组成的基金。 该基金将由州财政部长管理，并被授权每个财政年度将其总价值的10%投资于数字资产。该基金还包含一项条款，允许财政部长借出其持有的资产，前提是此举不会增加基金的财务风险状况。 目前的进展使得亚利桑那州与德克萨斯州和新罕布什尔州一起成为建立国家支持的数字资产储备的领先州之一。 正如 crypto.news 之前报道的那样，SB 1373 于 3 月 25 日与该州的比特币专用储备提案 SB 1025 一起获得了众议院规则委员会的批准。 您可能还喜欢：亚利桑那州带头推动比特币储备，两项法案获得众议院委员会通过 SB 1373 广泛涵盖数字资产，而 SB 1025 仅关注比特币，并允许亚利桑那州的财政和退休系统将最多 10% 的可用资金分配到 BTC。 该法案还包括一项条款，要求将比特币存储在独立的联邦储备账户中。该法案已于4月1日获得全体委员会通过，目前仍在等待最终投票。 然而，这两项法案都可能在州长办公室遭遇阻碍。亚利桑那州州长凯蒂·霍布斯威胁称，除非立法者通过一项为残疾人服务提供资金的法案，否则她将否决所有立法。然而，这两项法案都可能在州长办公室遭遇阻碍。亚利桑那州州长、民主党人凯蒂·霍布斯已承诺否决所有立法，直到立法者通过一项法案来解决该州发育障碍部门1.22亿美元的资金缺口。 霍布斯在 4 月 17 日的 X 帖子中批评共和党控制的立法机构的拨款提案“不严肃，完全行不通”。 本周她已经否决了 15 项法案，是 2024 年美国州长中否决率最高的，迄今为止她已经否决了超过 20% 的立法，其中大部分是共和党主导的。 亚利桑那州更广泛的加密货币战略还包括一项于二月份实施的措施，旨在遏制比特币ATM机欺诈。今年二月，议员们提交了第2387号众议院法案，旨在实施每日交易限额、强制运营商许可以及退款政策要求等措施，以保护用户免受诈骗。 Read more:Arizona advances Strategic Bitcoin Reserve Act to House

The collapse of a procedural Senate vote on stablecoin legislation (GENIUS Act) Thursday underscores the challenges of keeping cryptocurrency policy bipartisan. Once poised for smooth passage, the bill was derailed after last-minute Democratic objections and a lack of time to review final text — despite ongoing negotiations with Republican leadership. The 48–49 vote, with two Republicans joining Democrats in opposition, highlights deepening divisions over process and trust. While both parties publicly support regulating digital assets, the vote raises questions about whether crypto can remain a nonpartisan issue in a polarized Senate. In March, blockchain and digital asset attorney Marta Belcher confidently told crypto.news that support of crypto is nonpartisan: “I think it’s a misconception that crypto has become partisan. Many people on both sides of the aisle support crypto. I don’t think crypto is a partisan issue, just like ‘the Internet’ isn’t a partisan issue. I don’t think, in 2025, either party can be ‘anti’ an entire technology if they’re thinking seriously about America’s future.” If Belcher is right, then Democrats see support for crypto much differently than Republicans. If we look at what Democrats say about crypto regulations and topics they are concerned about in the sector, most of the time, we will find out they are not on the same page as Republicans. Take, for example, President Trump’s memecoin, Official Trump (TRUMP). The profits he and his family members generate from their DeFi business are becoming a major sticking point in bipartisan negotiations over stablecoin legislation. As Scott Galloway, a New York University Stern School of Business professor and co-host of the Raging Moderates podcast, recently told CNN, “The potential here for grift is just unprecedented.” Democratic Senators felt their Republican colleagues didn’t address the issue. Sen. Elizabeth Warren even encouraged the bill to ban sitting presidents from profiting off crypto ventures—an effort directly targeting Trump, who offered exclusive interactions with its top holders. Crypto in the Biden era  During President Joe Biden’s term, the cryptocurrency sector achieved several milestones. For example, Coinbase successfully became a NASDAQ-traded company. The outrightly crypto-skeptical Securities and Exchange Commission, then chaired by Gary Gensler, greenlighted Bitcoin exchange-traded funds. That wasn’t enough for the industry’s top bulls. SEC official Hester Peirce said on May 8 that the approval process for Bitcoin ETFs was “mismanaged” and told Bloomberg News that the delays alienated innovators. The crypto community also griped about alleged efforts to debank clients using digital assets, which they claimed was carried out by the FDIC and Department of Justice. The situation, colloquially known as Operation Choke Point 2.0, was scrutinized for being an overreach on the part of the former administration by Trump, Republican Sen. Cynthia Lummis and the Fed Chair, Jerome Powell. Gensler, a Democrat, filed numerous lawsuits against the cryptocurrency space during his term as SEC chair. The list includes Binance, Coinbase, Gemini, and Genesis, among others. One of the basic problems was the fact that Gensler insisted that most cryptocurrencies were nothing more than unregistered securities. This status was deemed prohibitive for innovation and current SEC officials prefer to view them as collectibles or commodities. Under Trump, the SEC dropped many of the charges filed initially under Gensler. Democrats seemingly decided to continue being cautious about crypto. Instead of fostering a free-breathing crypto experiment, they tried to play it slow to ensure no one was at risk.  However, this cautious approach can cost Democrats votes. A writer and CNN host, Van Jones, said that Democrats run people out of their party, noting that there are 50 million people owning crypto and going against them is “not smart.” CNN host @VanJones68 says, “Democrats ran people out of the party on crypto. 50 million people bought crypto. It’s a bet on a better future” pic.twitter.com/Ee8NlutNK1— Documenting ₿itcoin 📄 (@DocumentingBTC) January 6, 2025 Read more:US Senate votes against GENIUS Act after Democrat pushback Democrats and crypto today After tense negotiations that lasted for one week, the GENIUS ACT that should have regulated stablecoins in the U.S. failed in the Senate. Most Republicans, confident in their victory, tried to convince their colleagues to accept the bill as soon as possible and ignored the Democrats’ request to give them another week to prepare. People commenting on the news blamed Democrats for dedicating all their energy to blocking Republicans. The reality is that the genius act is actually not even a crypto bill if you really boil it down (must be non-yield bearing, BSA compliance etc), and the democrats still hate it—You really begin to wonder what they stand for— Jeff Park (@dgt10011) May 5, 2025 Jeff Park of Bitwise stressed that the bill wasn’t that radical and had high requirements for the stablecoin issuers. Warren, according to Axios, argued that the GENIUS Act lacked basic guardrails against corruption. She and other Democratic leaders reportedly looked at the numbers. Per the New York Times, Trump’s family members could profit from the $2 billion worth of their stablecoins that would be used for a foreign transaction involving an Abu Dhabi investment fund. And according to blockchain analytics firm Chainalysis, just 58 wallets have made over $10 million each from Trump’s memecoin so far. That’s $1.1 billion in profits. The majority of small holders (764,000 wallets) lost money. Sen. Richard Blumenthal, a Democrat, initiated a probe of the growing Trump crypto business and requested records from Fight Fight Fight LLC, a company behind the Official Trump token, and World Liberty Finance, a crypto enterprise launched by Trump’s sons. In addition to various crypto ventures, WLF is a stablecoin issuer. Blumenthal called Trump’s crypto business an unprecedented conflict of interest. Here’s what he wrote: “President Trump’s financial entanglements to the $TRUMP coin, as well as the attempted use of the White House to host competitions to prop up the value of $TRUMP, represents an unprecedented, pay-to-play scheme to provide access to the Presidency to the highest bidder.”  This is the message Democrats need to hammer:While Trump and his family are making hundreds of millions of dollars in their crypto grifts corruptly selling access to the presidency, he's raising prices on Americans, telling us to ration dolls, and decimating small businesses. pic.twitter.com/iDBd2RGTtu— Ahmed Baba (@AhmedBaba_) May 8, 2025 Democrats were trying to add provisions that would block Trump from making money via crypto before the end of the term, but the suggestion didn’t come to fruition. All these questions are serious, but they are seemingly not a priority for Republicans who want to move crypto legislation forward. “I have a sense that this is caught up in other issues,” Lummis said. Crenshaw’s take SEC Commissioner Caroline A. Crenshaw, also a Democrat, claims she represents “common sense” in the agency, while pushing forward the Gensler-era narratives that were criticized a long time ago. Crenshaw still sees cryptocurrencies as securities, which makes it difficult for crypto businesses to move forward. She also seems to oppose a deregulation approach to crypto. Crenshaw’s tenure finishes this year. Although she cannot block the SEC’s decisions, she may represent the views of Democrats on crypto for the remainder of 2025. If anyone wonders what the crypto industry will face in 3.5 years, if the Democrats win, read this dissent:https://t.co/9E6533dJDVTLDR – FAITH in the legacy of regulation by enforcement heralds a return to the Biden policies.THAT is why legislation is SO IMPORTANT.— Dave W (@daveweisberger1) May 9, 2025 Nevertheless, Belcher was right about the nonpartisan nature of the crypto agenda. Republicans seem to be more or less united on crypto progressivism. But some are equally dismayed by Trump’s bold crypto ventures as Democrats, who are seemingly steadfast in addressing crypto risks while protecting U.S. citizens.  Read more:Nic Carter revisits Operation Choke Point 2.0 after bombshell Silvergate testimony

美国国税局提出的一项有争议的税收规则可能会被推翻，因为立法者一直在推动废除该规则。该规则要求去中心化金融经纪人报告加密交易。 2 月 26 日，美国众议院提出一项废除该规则的决议，众议院筹款委员会以 26 票对 16 票通过了废除该规则的决议。该决议现已提交众议院全体会议表决。 如果该法案获得通过，参议院将决定其命运。如果参议院投票成功，该法案将提交给唐纳德·特朗普总统，特朗普可以签署该法案成为法律，也可以否决。但是，如果该法案没有被推翻，该法案将于 2027 年 1 月 1 日生效。 美国国税局于 2023 年 8 月提出并于 2024 年 1 月正式完成的“DeFi 经纪人规则”将要求某些 DeFi 运营商（包括去中心化交易所的前端服务提供商）收集和报告用户交易数据，包括加密货币销售的总收益。 据美国国税局称，它将采用与传统金融机构相同的标准，以“为纳税人提供公平的竞争环境”。 然而，行业领袖对此有不同的看法。筹款委员会主席杰森·史密斯等批评人士认为，这项规则不适用于 DeFi，因为 DeFi 平台通常在没有集中控制的情况下运行，并且从设计上就不会收集用户数据。 DeFi 教育基金首席执行官 Miller Whitehouse-Levine 在评论这一进展时对废除该规则的决定表示欢迎，他认为该规则代表着“非法和违宪的越权行为”，破坏了美国人的金融隐私并扼杀了去中心化金融的创新。 DeFi 的支持者此前曾对隐私问题表示担忧。一些人担心 Uniswap 等平台可能会被要求收集用户身份，这与去中心化金融的基本精神相悖。 Consensys 律师比尔·休斯 (Bill Hughes) 等人则认为，这是上一届政府在离任前严厉打击加密货币的最后一刻的尝试。 你可能还喜欢：DeFi 支持者反对美国国税局税法 美国国税局于 12 月 27 日最终确定该规则的第二天，区块链协会首席执行官克里斯汀·史密斯 (Kristin Smith) 称其“违宪”，并警告说，这可能会将加密创新推向海外。 德克萨斯州区块链委员会主席 Lee Bratcher 也表达了同样的担忧，他表示对于去中心化领域的许多企业来说，合规“实际上是不可能的”。 区块链协会、DeFi 教育基金和德克萨斯州区块链委员会已经起诉美国国税局，声称该规则将迫使 DeFi 开发商遵守他们根本无法实施的法规。 尽管存在争议，但美国国税局立场坚定。该机构在与财政部的联合声明中驳斥了 DeFi 应被豁免的论点，称“拥有技术专长并经营与金融服务相关的交易或业务的人员应遵守与任何其他经营金融服务业务的人员相同的规则。” 阅读更多：SEC 放弃对阻止有争议的加密货币经纪自营商规则的裁决的上诉