Algorand price could crash further as staking outflows jump

本周，加密领域的风险投资总额超过 1.05 亿美元。基础设施和人工智能解决方案在不同的融资阶段获得了可观的资金。 TNFT 市场 Taproot Wizards 获得了 3000 万美元的融资，而本周其他融资行业则特别关注 DePIN、游戏基础设施以及区块链技术中的 AI 集成。 根据 Crypto Fundraising 的数据，让我们来看看 2 月第一周的投资情况。 你可能还喜欢：比特币价格形成罕见模式：可能飙升至 16.6 万美元 Taproot Wizards，3000万美元 Standard Crypto、Cyber Fund 和 Colludere 参与了这轮 3000 万美元的融资 该项目由 Udi Wertheimer 和 Eric Wall 创立，正在比特币（BTC）上建立一个 NFT 市场。 2023年，Taproot Wizards项目获得了Standard Crypto 750万美元的投资。 水库，1400万美元 加密基础设施初创公司获得 1400 万美元 A 轮融资 由 Union Square Ventures、Variant 和 Archetype 提供支持 我们致力于为每条链上的代币交易构建世界上最好的开发工具。pic.twitter.com/8ZukljMGNK— Reservoir (@reservoir0x) 2025 年 2 月 5 日 奥拉斯（Olas），1380万美元 在由 1kx、Toska Capital 和 Sigil Fund 支持的未知一轮融资中筹集了 1380 万美元 OLAS 是一个统一的链下服务网络，提供自动化、预言机和共同拥有的 AI。该协议支持以太坊、Polygon、Gnosis 和 Solana 区块链。 — BlockchainGamer.biz (@BCGbiz) 2025 年 2 月 4 日 游戏公司，1000万美元 在一轮未知融资中筹得 1000 万美元 这家总部位于迪拜的公司是谷歌和微软初创企业计划的一部分，得到了 Telcoin、Paul Neuner 和 BullPerks 的支持 The Game Company 开发了一个平台，利用其专利的低延迟技术，让 PC 和主机游戏在任何设备上都能无延迟地畅玩。该公司与 Aethir 进行了合作，利用未充分利用的 GPU 和区块链激励措施来提供 AI 处理和云流。 Herd 为 AI 智能合约筹集 180 万美元 玉米通过公开发售获得了 150 万美元，FDV 为 1.4994 亿美元 Fraktion 为现实世界资产筹集了 114 万美元 W Chain 筹集了 70 万美元用于 L1 支付 Multisynq 为 DePIN 基础设施筹集了 35 万美元

币安更新了其法定交易做市商计划，增加了一个新的欧元市场层级，最低做市商交易量百分比为 1%。 根据最近的通知，加密货币交易平台已在币安的法定货币流动性提供商计划中为其欧元市场引入了第二层级。从 2025 年 3 月 24 日 UTC 时间 00:00 开始，欧元市场将有两个交易层级，而不是一个。 第一级要求币安用户每周挂单量占比达到 0.5%，第二级要求用户每周挂单量占比达到 1%。 挂单量百分比是用户在特定法定货币市场中的挂单交易量占整个平台该市场挂单交易总量的百分比。此指标决定了用户是否有资格享受该计划中的不同等级，每个等级提供不同的费用回扣。 根据通知，流动性提供者将按照新计划机制每周接受审核。 你可能还喜欢：14 亿美元 Bybit 遭黑客攻击后，币安呼吁加强安全监管 除了新的等级之外，平台还将更新欧元市场的挂单费用返利率，欧元一级用户将获得-0.005%的挂单费用返还，欧元二级用户将获得-0.010%的挂单费用返还。 与流动性提供者类似，挂单费用返利将从 2025 年 4 月 1 日 00:00 UTC 开始每周更新一次。挂单费用返利将根据前一周在选定法币市场的现货交易表现分配给流动性提供者。 随着新更新，欧元市场成为第六种获得第二个交易等级的法定货币。其他拥有两个等级的法定货币市场包括 BRL、ARS、MXN、COP 和 JPY。 今天早些时候，澳大利亚当局警告加密货币交易者，请注意一种正在进行的欺诈手段，诈骗者会冒充币安代表，联系受害者并发出虚假警告，例如声称他们的币安账户已被侵入。 你可能还喜欢：澳大利亚联邦警察警告称，币安冒充诈骗活动主要针对本地居民

Consensys 老板 Joseph Lubin 表示，去中心化最终可以带来“真正的资本主义”，以回应 Vitalik Buterin 看似元讽刺的“让共产主义再次伟大”。 Consensys 首席执行官约瑟夫·鲁宾 (Joseph Lubin) 对以太坊联合创始人维塔利克·布特林 (Vitalik Buterin) 最近发表的“让共产主义再次伟大”的讽刺性言论进行了评论，称去中心化可能是最终实现真正资本主义的关键。 人们不断地对 V 进行批评，也许最终他会感到沮丧，并以荒谬的言论进行挑衅和讽刺——这与他的幽默感和对荒谬的关注是一致的。请注意，他的父母和他一起逃离了共产主义俄罗斯……— Joseph Lubin (@ethereumJoseph) 2025 年 2 月 13 日 他的评论是对布特林讽刺性推文的回应，该推文似乎呼应了他早期长篇大论的《堕落共产主义》中的一些观点，该书探讨了在去中心化系统中传播财富的概念。 “我个人认为，我们目前正在迎来一个新时代，我认为这个时代就是集体资本主义。现在确实是让资本主义第一次变得伟大的时候，因为我们从未在地球上真正经历过资本主义。” 约瑟夫·鲁宾 鲁宾还解释了布特林发表上述声明的原因，他表示“人们一直在批评”维塔利克，这促使他“以挑衅性和讽刺性的方式发表荒谬的言论”——这符合他典型的荒诞幽默。 “请注意，他小时候，他的父母就带着他逃离了共产主义俄罗斯。他的父亲 Dima 完全信任 V 的判断。” Joseph Lubin 虽然鲁宾没有深入探讨“纯粹资本主义”如何运作的具体细节，但他强调，去中心化可以帮助实现这一目标。 你可能还喜欢：“让我有想要放弃的情感渴望”：以太坊的 Buterin 对社区专注于“degen casino”感到沮丧

Disclosure: The views and opinions expressed here belong solely to the author and do not represent the views and opinions of crypto.news’ editorial. In just the past few months, several high-profile wallet exploits have shaken the crypto world, from sophisticated phishing campaigns to browser vulnerabilities that exposed users’ private keys. Crypto wallets are supposed to be the bedrock of democratized finance—tools that give users direct, sovereign control over their assets. Instead, they often feel like rickety scaffolding: unstable, unforgiving, and ready to collapse under the weight of a single mistake. You might also like:Web3 wallets: The digital payment solution for the next billion users | Opinion For all the innovation in web3, wallets remain one of its weakest links—and one of the biggest barriers to mainstream adoption. The core problem? An outdated reliance on seed phrases. This decades-old security model asks ordinary users to perform like cybersecurity experts, with no room for error. Forget your seed phrase, or store it insecurely, and your assets are gone forever. It’s a user experience nightmare masquerading as a security feature. This is not merely inconvenient—it’s actively deterring potential users. As an industry, we need to intervene. ETFs show users want crypto, but not wallets Take a look at the surge in crypto ETF inflows over the last year. Institutional and retail investors alike recognize crypto’s enormous potential and want exposure, yet overwhelmingly choose indirect investment vehicles like ETFs instead of direct asset ownership. Why is this happening when crypto offers so many compelling features, so many ways to increase your yield? It’s because the user experience is that bad. Crypto wallet interfaces are notoriously complex, security is overly burdensome, and recovery processes are unforgiving. Faced with the daunting task of navigating this hostile environment, mainstream users have understandably gravitated toward traditional financial structures, preferring familiarity and simplicity. This stark reality indicates that users are willing—even eager—to participate in the crypto ecosystem, but wallet usability and security barriers hold them back. Seed phrases: A dangerous UX failure At the heart of wallet design failures are seed phrases—12 to 24-word strings users must store securely, offline, without mistakes. Sounds simple. Except that thousands of hackers, some extremely sophisticated or even state-sponsored, actively target your device—your files, your browser cache, your clipboard data, anything they can access–trying to steal your seed phrase and drain your funds.  Expecting everyday individuals, who are neither cryptographers nor cybersecurity specialists, to execute this task flawlessly is unreasonable. Seed phrases offer no second chances—misplacing or losing them means losing everything, permanently. Imagine if traditional finance operated this way—if accidentally losing or exposing your debit card number meant instantly losing every dollar in your bank account. The financial system would descend into chaos. Traditional finance institutions have long recognized that security must be robust yet forgiving, accounting for human error. Crypto wallet design, however, continues to rely on an outdated security model built around unrealistic expectations of user diligence. This disconnect has resulted in countless stories of lost funds due to forgotten seed phrases, devices malfunctioning, and simple human errors. Poor UX is a systemic risk to web3 Poor wallet UX does not merely inconvenience individual users—it presents a systemic risk to the broader web3 ecosystem. News headlines frequently highlight lost assets, phishing scams, and compromised wallets—all directly attributable to confusing interfaces and poor security designs. These stories erode trust, perpetuating the narrative that crypto is inherently unsafe and inaccessible. This perception of crypto as overly complicated and hazardous is driving potential adopters away. New users evaluating whether to enter the crypto market often read horror stories, not success stories, prompting them to seek safer and simpler traditional investment vehicles. Until UX improves to accommodate everyday users, crypto will remain confined to tech-savvy enthusiasts who can navigate the pitfalls—the groundswell of adoption we keep waiting for will never come. Innovation exists—why aren’t wallet providers adopting it? Modern cryptographic technologies—such as threshold signatures, multi-party computation , and seedless recovery—provide secure, user-friendly alternatives to traditional seed phrase-based security. Threshold signatures distribute signing authority across multiple devices or entities, eliminating single points of failure. MPC enables secure cryptographic operations without revealing private keys. Seedless recovery methods allow users to safely restore wallet access without risking permanent loss. Despite the availability and proven effectiveness of these solutions, wallet providers have shown frustratingly little urgency in adopting them. Many wallets continue to rely heavily on outdated methods simply due to inertia or misplaced priorities. By stubbornly clinging to obsolete designs, wallet providers risk not just individual user assets but the credibility and growth potential of the entire web3 ecosystem. It’s time for wallets to grow up As web3 leaders, we should look at retail ETF adoption and be furious. Every last dollar should be on-chain, helping to back the growth of protocols, not lining the pockets of institutions. Crypto’s UX is so bad that users are willing to pay ETF management fees to avoid it. Web3’s broader adoption and ultimate success depend on wallets becoming user-centric, secure, and forgiving. Only then can crypto break free from its niche constraints and fulfill its promise of revolutionizing finance for the masses. Read more:Crypto wallet security needs a rethink | Opinion JP Thor JP Thoris the creator of Vultisig, a seedless, multi-chain crypto vault designed to eliminate single points of failure and bring secure, self-sovereign custody to both human users and AI agents.

拍卖国家地标的冠名权可以提供积极主动的、预算中性的推动力，呼应了特朗普总统利用数字资产实现美国繁荣的号召。 On March 6, 2025, President Donald J. Trump signed an Executive Order establishing the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and U.S. Digital Asset Stockpile, a decisive step to make America the “crypto capital of the world,” as outlined in the White House Fact Sheet released today.  By designating Bitcoin (BTC) a reserve asset — initially funded with 88,000 BTC of forfeited holdings — the order charges the Secretaries of Treasury and Commerce with crafting budget-neutral strategies to acquire more, a move the U.S. deems necessary in its quest for global cryptocurrency dominance. 以下是该行政命令的全文：建立战略比特币储备和美国数字资产储备2025 年 3 月 6 日https://t.co/sQXmaW0X11— David Sacks (@davidsacks47) 2025 年 3 月 7 日 提出一个大胆而又实用的想法：拍卖美国自然奇观的冠名权。想象一下黄石公园中倾泻而下的“Tether Falls”、密歇根曾经所在位置的“Lake Binance”或田纳西州崛起的“Bitfinex Smoky Mountains”。这不仅仅是异想天开——这是一条以市场为导向的积累比特币的道路，以天赋和财政纪律实现总统的愿景。 It is a blueprint that exists in sports. Naming rights have long turned stadiums into cash cows without diluting their purpose. The New York Mets’ 20-year, $400 million deal for Citi Field, initiated in 2009, remains the most significant, but the San Francisco Giants’ 2019 contract with Oracle Park is estimated to have an average annual value of $15 million. Additionally, the Texas Rangers’ deal for Globe Life Field in 2017 and the Houston Astros’ agreement for Daikin Park in 2024 are both believed to be generating at least $11 million annually. If corporations pay top dollar to brand a ballpark or football stadium, why not a waterfall, national park, lake or forest? The White House’s mandate for cost-free innovation makes this a natural fit — transforming public landmarks into Bitcoin-neutral acquisition strategies outlined by the latest Executive Order. You might also like:Trump signs executive order establishing a US Strategic Bitcoin Reserve 当美国的广阔荒野向你招手时，为什么要在体育场停留呢？将大峡谷变成“Pump.fun Grand Abyss”，加密货币交易者可能会出高价，让他们最喜欢的 memecoin 在谷歌地图上重新命名。将雷尼尔山重新命名为“罗宾汉雷尼尔山”，并观看区块链先驱们争相夺取其白雪皑皑的王冠。甚至佛罗里达群岛也可以被称为“Chainlink Keys”，尼亚加拉瀑布被称为“Pwease Falls”，诱使数字资产公司在热带品牌重塑上投入数字黄金。这些并不是胆怯的调整——它们是响亮而自豪的加密货币广告牌，将大自然变成比特币蜜罐，同时让纳税人免于承担责任。 这些数字可能非常惊人。假设尼亚加拉大瀑布的更名在一个世纪内带来 5 亿美元——考虑到体育场的先例，这是合理的数额——而其他 50 个地标（湖泊、国家公园、山脉、河流、峡谷）平均每个带来 1 亿美元。那就是 55 亿美元。 截至 2025 年 3 月，比特币的当前价格为每枚 90,000 美元，这将产生约 61,111 BTC。如果突破重磅资产的界限——比如 Coinbase 湾，而不是最近更名的美国湾，或者“双子大峡谷”每枚价值 10 亿美元——那么 100 年内总量可能接近 100,000 BTC。这些都不是一次性的；每世纪重新拍卖一次，根据通货膨胀和比特币的轨迹进行调整，确保资金稳定流动，符合行政命令的长期愿景。 批评者可能会对“Coinbase 倒闭”感到遗憾，谴责其失去了庄严感。但芬威球场的魅力经受住了品牌根源的考验，尽管瑞格利球场的名字灵感来自口香糖，但它仍然蓬勃发展。公众的品味在不断适应——Crypto.com Arena 在洛杉矶的崛起表明，大胆创新很快会得到认可。更好的是，这笔意外之财可以资助保护工作，帮助将美国国家公园管理局每年 30 亿美元的预算负担降至最低，这一切都符合政府效率部的精神，也符合新签署的行政命令。 风险再高不过了。《事实说明书》哀叹，过早出售比特币导致 170 亿美元损失，这是惰性代价的教训。2100 万枚比特币的数量永远固定不变，比特币的“数字黄金”地位需要采取行动。行政命令集中没收的资产，但单靠扣押无法扩大世界领先的储备。在接管更多政府的同时，增加美联储的比特币金库也不会有这样的效果，目前比特币金库已经达到 36 万亿美元（并且还在增加）。 因此，冠名权提供了一种积极主动的、预算中性的推动力，呼应了特朗普总统的呼吁，即利用数字资产实现繁荣，而不给美国公众增加债务负担。 出售缅因州、佛蒙特州和马萨诸塞州购买比特币对预算没有影响。— Max Keiser (@maxkeiser) 2025 年 3 月 7 日 实施需要勇气。拍卖必须公开而激烈，邀请 Coinbase 竞标一些不知名的 meme-coin 初创公司。无需克制——如果价格合适，就让“Polkadot Pikes Peak”或“XRP Yosemite”飞起来。财政部可以安排比特币购买时间以避开波动，因为事实说明书允许精明的管理。 This isn’t about defacing nature — it’s about seizing a moment. Lake Michigan will still shimmer; the Mississippi River will still roar. The real prize is a bussin’ Bitcoin reserve, built without fiscal strain, proving America can lead the crypto charge with creativity and swagger. Whatever it takes, please. You might also like:“巨大的政治误判？”——特朗普加密战略储备改革内幕