TAIKO Layer 2 代币在 Revolut 上首次亮相，覆盖超过 4500 万用户

Mantra has failed to take advantage of today’s market rally, erasing earlier gains due to continued negative sentiment. Weeks after the collapse of the Mantra (OM) token, users are still seeking answers about what happened. On Friday, May 9, OM was down 2.09%, despite a broader market rally, trading at $0.3667 and erasing its earlier gains. Earlier in the day, the token had climbed to a daily high of $0.3923, suggesting the potential for a breakout. However, it is now trading below both its 10-day and 20-day simple moving averages, which stand at $0.40614 and $0.4666, respectively. If Mantra can reclaim and sustain those levels, it would signal a possible shift in momentum. For now, though, technical indicators and investor sentiment are weighing on the token, suggesting that a reversal is unlikely in the near term. Instead of a breakout, OM quickly retraced, continuing the steady decline that has persisted for weeks. Investors still demand answers over Mantra’s 95% drop The token’s slide has continued since the sharp collapse on April 13, when Mantra, a real-world asset token, suddenly lost 95% of its value. While the team initially blamed exchanges for liquidity mismanagement, online investigators have shared a different narrative. Read more:Mantra price plummets: What happened to the real-world asset token? Several on-chain sleuths, including Choze and Onchain Lens, highlighted large movements from Mantra’s wallets to exchanges. While not definitive proof of insider selling, many in the community believe that’s exactly what occurred. Fueling further concern are allegations that the Mantra team controls up to 90% of the token’s supply. According to Onchain Lens, this level of control allowed the team to artificially pump OM’s price for months. In response to the crash and growing scrutiny, CEO John Mullin pledged to burn 150 million staked OM tokens, a portion of the team’s holdings. With a circulating supply of 1.66 billion, the burn would account for just under 10% of the token’s total supply. Read more:MANTRA price crushes below $0.4 as RSI hits 17 — is a reversal near?

加密货币交易所 HashKey 推出其首款人工智能驱动产品 ModAI。该公司还计划扩展其产品，包括可以在区块链上交易的人工智能代理。 4 月 3 日，这家总部位于香港的加密货币交易所发布了其最新产品 ModAI，迈出了进军人工智能领域的第一步。根据其官方网站介绍，HashKey 的 ModAI 旨在审核内容、生成虚拟化身、以聊天机器人的身份与用户互动并提供客户支持。 据《南华早报》报道，该公司表示，这款人工智能驱动的工具可能会将运营成本降低 80%，并使用户参与度翻一番。ModAI 使用大型语言模型或 LLM 的组合，包括 DeepSeek、OpenAI、Anthropic 和 Meta Platforms。 该人工智能工具可以用多种语言回应用户，包括中文、英语、日语和越南语。该公司计划在今年晚些时候在其知识库中添加更多语言。 你可能还喜欢：OpenAI 宣布 5000 亿美元 AI 项目后 Stargate Finance 上涨 13% HashKey 的产品副总裁兼人工智能团队负责人 Sean Wang 表示，该加密公司最初计划开发自己的 LLM，但由于创建 LLM 所需的成本太高而决定放弃。 另一方面，王先生表示，公司计划扩展其人工智能工具，包括可以为用户执行各种任务的人工智能代理。王先生解释说，HashKey (HSK) 希望其人工智能代理未来能够完成的任务之一是根据用户的资本和目标回报自动投资加密资产。 人工智能代理已成为加密货币领域的热门话题，因为交易者倾向于使用这些代理来管理财务，因为这些代理提供便利和创新。然而，也有一些人批评了它们在加密货币社区中的实用性和功能。 近日，币安联合创始人赵长鹏表示，大多数时候，AI代理开发者花费太多时间专注于为他们的AI代理开发代币，而不是代理的实用性。因此，他建议开发者在推出代币之前，先制作一个“真正优秀的代理”。 今年 1 月早些时候，CZ 还批评人工智能聊天机器人带来“懒惰”，因为它们只能告诉用户他们已经知道的内容，而不能为他们提供新的信息。 “人工智能聊天机器人的问题在于，我经常不知道我不知道什么。我不知道该问什么。如果它能告诉我我应该知道的事情就好了。太懒了，”CZ 在他的帖子中写道。 上个月，HashKey 启动了一项新举措，对香港的加密货币和加密货币交易所进行评级，以帮助当地加密货币公司遵守该地区的虚拟资产监管框架。 你可能还喜欢：CZ 批评 AI 聊天机器人 “懒惰”，CZ 对加密货币中的 AI 有何看法？

尽管人们都在谈论美国在创建战略 BTC 储备方面的领导作用，但欧洲国家也没有回避加密货币。捷克共和国将很快决定创建比特币储备。其他国家和公司也在囤积 BTC。 目录捷克共和国建立比特币储备美国比特币储备怎么样？其他玩家 捷克共和国建立比特币储备 捷克央行行长AleÅ¡ Michl将于2025年1月30日推出BTC收购计划。如果该计划获得批准，捷克共和国可能成为欧洲第一个设立BTC储备的国家。捷克央行持有超过1460亿美元。根据该计划，将有超过73亿美元以比特币形式分配，这意味着捷克央行余额的5%将以比特币形式持有。 只是为了更好地理解这一点：仅这些 BTC 购买量就相当于约 5.3 个月的新开采比特币供应量。 美国等不了六个月。我们现在就得走……pic.twitter.com/Lhe0HBvhbA— David Bailey🇵🇷 0.85mm/btc 是底价 (@DavidFBailey) 2025 年 1 月 29 日 那么，美国的情况如何？空气中弥漫着 SBR 的气息吗？简短的回答是“是的”。为对冲通胀和消除国家债务而提出的 BTC 储备将于今年建立。然而，目前有几种相互竞争的储备模式，其中哪一种将被采用仍是一个悬而未决的问题。我们可能会看到几种模式同时存在或以混合模式存在。 在 2024 年夏天的纳什维尔加密货币会议上，特朗普表示，如果他当选，美国将建立一个比特币储备库，里面存放被扣押的比特币，从此以后不会再出售任何比特币。然而，参议员辛西娅·卢米斯提出的比特币储备提案却有所不同。她的举动表明，美国政府将在五年内购买 100 万比特币，并将在 20 年内保持所有比特币完好无损。考虑到卢米斯成为参议院数字资产小组委员会主席的事实，她的提案很有可能被接受。 阅读更多： 建立企业、国家或地区比特币储备的想法在世界各地获得了越来越多的支持者。现代比特币的支持者将比特币比作殖民者从当地部落廉价购买的土地。比特币和土地一样稀缺。它让那些希望长期投资并尽快增加投资的人产生了错失恐惧症 (FOMO)。 在众多国家中，萨尔瓦多绝对是最大胆拥抱比特币的国家——2021 年，萨尔瓦多将比特币作为与美元等值的法定货币。截至 2025 年 1 月，没有其他国家敢这样做。萨尔瓦多的加密储备超过 6,000 BTC。 其他国家也有 BTC 储备项目。巴西和捷克共和国一样，将把其 5% 的国家储备转换为比特币。该立法于 11 月出台。比特币还将用于支持当地的 CBDC。 俄罗斯和日本曾考虑设立BTC储备的可能性，但后来搁置了这些计划，以便稍后做出更明智的决定。 波兰今年将举行总统选举，自由党候选人索沃米尔·门岑 (SÅ‚awomir Mentzen) 承诺建立比特币储备，但目前尚不清楚他赢得选举的几率有多大。 加密货币竞赛已经到来，许多政府和公司都在积极参与比特币和其他加密货币。事实上，这场竞赛并不局限于创建比特币储备。它包括发展与加密货币的新型关系的各种方向，从受益于 BTC 挖矿到采用加密货币作为法定货币。 你可能还喜欢：越来越多的公司选择比特币作为企业储备的主要资产

Memecoin launchpad Boop.fun’s founder is facing scrutiny after former Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao’s post questions his credentials. Memecoin launchpad Boop.fun is under fire as new posts from former Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao raise questions about the credentials of its founder. On Monday, May 5, CZ publicly stated that Binance never had a Chief Revenue Officer position, a title Boop.fun’s founder claims to have held. 以下照片纯属截图，请勿对号入座 pic.twitter.com/wmN920sDKN— KL (@0xb2991_) May 5, 2025 In response to a new project that launched on Solana and later moved to BNB Chain, CZ referenced a former Binance employee who was fired for insider trading. He noted that this individual falsely claimed to have held an executive position that never existed. “There are also former employees who were fired by Binance for insider trading, who claimed to be the founder or CXO of something a few years later. Binance has never had any other C-Os except the CEO, CTO, CMO, CCO, CFO, and COO,” CZ of Binance. CZ questions Boop.fun’s credentials Several users pointed to Dingaling on X as the potential employee CZ was referring to. In his X bio, Dingaling claims he was both be both the former Binance Chief Revenue Officer and a founder of the DEX PancakeSwap. The CRO position, according to CZ, never existed on Binance. You might also like:Are NFTs making a comeback or just riding the hype? Here’s what the numbers say Although Binance’s former CEO did not reveal whether or not he was talking about Dingaling, his post still contradicts his supposed credentials. Instead, Dingaling appears to be an NFT investor turned social media influencer. According to a report by NFT Ethics in November of 2022, Dingaling’s real name is Dinghua Ziao, an Australian man of Chinese origin. According to the published information, he is an NFT investor, and one of the earliest investors in the game. At the time, he owned more than 100 Bored Apes and 70 Azuki NFTs, and was one of the early investors in CryptoKittens. These projects were which were some of the biggest NFTs at the time. Despite the questions about Ziao’s credentials, boop.fun’s token is currently listed on Binance Alpha launchpad. Read more:Binance to rollout crypto payments and blockchain education programs in Kyrgyzstan

Bitcoin’s dominance relative to other major cryptocurrencies continues to soar reaching a new 4-year high. Bitcoin’s (BTC) dominance has surged to 64%, a four-year high, signaling its unrivaled strength in the cryptocurrency market. This metric, which measures Bitcoin’s share of the total crypto market capitalization, reflects a growing preference for Bitcoin as a safe haven amid economic uncertainty. As BTC’s price hovers above $96,000, institutional inflows via ETFs and corporate treasury adoption, like Metaplanet’s 5,000 BTC holdings, are fueling this rally. But what does this mean for other major blockchain chains like Ethereum (ETH), Solana (SOL), and Binance Chain (BNB)? Source: crypto.news ETH, despite a recent 15% surge to $1,800 over the last two weeks, struggles with a market dominance of just 7.4%, its lowest since January 2020. Its ETH/BTC ratio, at 0.115, underscores BTC’s outperformance, driven by ETH’s high transaction costs and slower innovation compared to newer layer-1 chains. You might also like:Bitcoin dominance hits new cycle high as post-election altcoin rally fizzles out: Matrixport Solana and Binance Chain, while gaining traction for faster transactions, lack the institutional trust Bitcoin commands. Analysts suggest Bitcoin’s dominance may peak soon, potentially triggering an altcoin season as capital rotates to undervalued projects. However, regulatory uncertainty and weak fundamentals in many altcoins could delay this shift. For now, Bitcoin’s dominance stifles altcoin growth, as investors prioritize its proven store-of-value narrative over speculative ventures. Chains like Ethereum and Solana, meanwhile, are trying to innovate rapidly or risk losing further ground. Solana’s focus on scalability offers hope, but without broader adoption, altcoins face a prolonged trough of disillusionment. Bitcoin’s reign, backed by BlackRock’s Larry Fink calling it a hedge against U.S. debt and orange-pilled BTC maxis like Strategy’S Michael Saylor, suggests altcoins still need compelling use cases to compete. Read more:Tokenized matchmaking? Sam Altman’s World matches up with dating app giant Match Group