Bitwise 称，特朗普代币波动并不成问题，因为监管机构“赞成市场游戏化”

World Liberty Financial 采用 wBTC 取代 Coinbase 的 cbBTC，此举受到孙宇晨的赞扬，他曾指责该交易所的托管做法不可靠。 Arkham Intelligence 的数据显示，与 WLF 关联的地址持有价值 5640 万美元的 WBTC，其中以太坊 (ETH) 位居榜首，价值超过 1.81 亿美元。没有公开记录表明 WLF 持有 cbBTC。 阅读更多：孙宇晨建议逢低买入，TRX 价格出现双底

加密数据聚合器 CoinGecko 根据与美国的“重要联系”提出了一种新的代币类别。 加密货币价格数据聚合平台 CoinGecko 推出了一个新类别，其中列出了通过创始团队或公司总部与美国挂钩的代币。 在 1 月 20 日 X 的公告中，该平台推出了新的类别“美国制造”，其中列出了“通过创始团队或公司总部与美国有重要联系”的代币。 新类别：美国制造🇺🇸我们为就职日添加了#MadeinUSA 硬币类别！查看完整列表：https://t.co/EZes9tQkvw pic.twitter.com/CpA31o9XuS— CoinGecko (@coingecko) 2025 年 1 月 20 日 该名单包含 18 种代币，总市值为 4320 亿美元，其中包括 XRP (XRP)、Solana (SOL) 和当选总统唐纳德·特朗普最近推出的 meme coin（称为 Official Trump (TRUMP)）。CoinGecko 并未解释选择代币的具体标准，这引起了加密社区的批评。 你可能还喜欢：CoinGecko 称以太坊和 TRON 控制着 84% 的稳定币市场 该声明引发了加密货币社区的批评，许多人指出，该声明遗漏了一些与美国有关的知名项目。例如，Algorand (ALGO) 被排除在外，尽管该网络的创始人 Silvio Micali 是麻省理工学院的教授。虽然 Algorand 基金会在新加坡运营，但一些人认为其美国根源值得纳入。其他被忽视的代币包括 Cardano (ADA)、Injective (INJ) 和 World (WLD) 等。 截至发稿时，CoinGecko 尚未公开评论遗漏或选择背后的方法。该平台可能会根据社区反馈更新列表，但尚未发表任何官方声明。 阅读更多：CoinGecko 否认虚假截图指控种族主义代币上市

Ethereum’s latest update could make DeFi protocol feel like normal apps, and boost ETH in the long run, says P2P.org’s executive. For the past year, Ethereum (ETH) has been steadily losing dominance to other altcoins, as well as Bitcoin. Layer 2 networks are eating into Ethereum’s revenue, causing some traders to question the network’s evolving tokenomics. Rather than give in to the pressure, the Ethereum Foundation has doubled down, launching a new update focused entirely on usability and scalability. Artemiy Parshakov, Vice President of Institutions at staking infrastructure provider P2P.org, explained to crypto.news why this is the correct approach. Instead of prioritizing short-term revenue, the upcoming Pectra upgrade aims to make decentralized apps more user-friendly, introduce new features to the network, and help Ethereum reinforce its leadership in the DeFi space. Read more:Pectra upgrade could flip sentiment for Ethereum: MEXC COO crypto.news: What are the most consequential changes that the Pectra upgrade brings to Ethereum?  Artemiy Parshakov: The Pectra upgrade is honestly a game-changer for Ethereum staking. The most radical shift is moving from the rigid 32 ETH validator limit to allowing up to 2048 ETH per validator. This completely transforms the economics for operators like us. We’re also excited about auto-compounding. Instead of rewards just sitting there, they’ll now automatically feed back into your validator, growing your stake over time. Our models show this could bump returns from 3.2% to around 3.4% over five years – doesn’t sound huge, but that’s an extra ETH per validator at current prices. You might also like:Pectra upgrade could flip sentiment for Ethereum: MEXC COO Another big win is the slashing penalty reduction. The initial penalty is dropping by 128x, from 1 ETH to about 0.008 ETH per 32 ETH staked. This makes staking dramatically safer without compromising network security. For more conservative clients who’ve been hesitant to stake, this removes a major barrier. And finally, partial withdrawals mean you’re not locked in completely. You can pull some ETH while keeping your validator running – much more flexible than the all-or-nothing approach we’ve had until now. CN: The Pectra upgrade is focused on account abstraction, with specific upgrades to transaction batching, gas sponsorship and authentication. What are some of the innovations on the dApp front that this may enable?  AP: Account abstraction opens up possibilities that were simply impossible before. The ability to delegate control from standard accounts to smart contracts means we can finally build DeFi and staking products that feel like normal apps. The gas sponsorship aspect is huge. Think about onboarding new users to staking – they’ve always needed ETH just to pay for transactions. Now, validators can sponsor those gas fees, removing that initial friction completely. Users can essentially interact with Ethereum without directly holding ETH for gas. You might also like:What is Gwei and why it matters for Ethereum users We’re already working on practical applications at P2P.org. One feature in our R&D pipeline automatically calculates ideal withdrawal timing based on network conditions. Before Pectra, this would require manual intervention, but now we can build systems that execute these withdrawals automatically when the timing is perfect. We’re also exploring cross-protocol interoperability – imagine seamlessly moving your staked assets between protocols like SSV, EigenLayer, and Swell to optimize returns. Account abstraction makes these complex interactions much more streamlined. CN: How does raising the maximum effective validator balance from 32 ETH to 2048 ETH impact P2P.org’s operations related to validators?  AP: This change is transformative for our operational approach. A single 640 ETH validator will generate the same rewards as twenty separate 32 ETH validators.  We’ve been preparing for this for months, testing extensively to ensure we’re ready on day one. Our approach is to strategically cap validator balances at 1,920 ETH rather than the full 2,048 ETH. This gives us a two-year runway before hitting the limit where auto-compounding would stop – ensuring uninterrupted compounding benefits for our users. The operational savings aren’t just good for our bottom line – they allow us to offer better rates to clients. We’re already working on ways to pass these efficiency gains back to stakers through higher rewards. CN: Do you foresee the potential for centralization risk from increasing validator balance?  AP: This is a question we’ve thought about extensively. The design is actually quite elegant – larger validators maintain the standard attestation frequency but their votes carry proportionally greater weight. So a 2048 ETH validator has the same influence as 64 individual validators, preserving the security model. The interesting aspect is that Pectra might actually encourage more decentralization. Currently, there’s a significant barrier to entry with the technical complexity of running many validators. By allowing consolidation, smaller operators can compete more effectively on efficiency rather than scale. CN: Ethereum is trending toward making transactions cheaper, especially by leveraging L2s. However, this appears to be hurting its revenue in the short term. What is your perspective on the long-term effects of this trend, and should Ethereum focus more on generating revenue in the short term?   AP: Ethereum’s approach here shows real strategic vision rather than chasing quarterly results. Making transactions more affordable through L2s and efficiency improvements is building a more sustainable ecosystem for the long run. The history of technology shows that platforms prioritizing affordability and accessibility eventually win the market. Look at how AWS democratized cloud computing or how cheaper smartphones drove mobile adoption globally. You might also like:‘Make me feel emotional desire to quit:’ Ethereum’s Buterin frustrated by community’s focus on ‘degen casino’ With Pectra specifically, the protocol is becoming more efficient from a cost perspective while actually improving the economics for stakers through features like auto-compounding. This balances the needs of users and validators in a way that strengthens the entire ecosystem. We see these changes as part of Ethereum’s natural evolution. Our focus at P2P.org has always been on performance optimization – we’re currently ranked #1 for validator effectiveness among major operators. These protocol improvements allow us to push that performance even further while making staking more accessible to everyone. The innovations around flexible fee structures and account abstraction will likely drive more users to the network, creating a larger pie for everyone rather than optimizing for short-term fees. Read more:Ethereum’s stablecoin market cap jumps 1m-fold since the first time ETH reached $1,4k

3 月 18 日，路透社报道称，多家加密货币公司正在寻求成为州立或国家银行，他们认为这是特朗普政府下扩大业务的途径。加密货币公司一旦成为银行，会发生什么变化？ 事实上，多方面的加密平台和银行已经具有重叠的功能。许多银行允许客户通过加密货币存储他们的储蓄，通过收益挖矿或质押来增加资本，或获得加密贷款。在拥有大量无银行账户智能手机人口的地区，加密平台已经占据了类似银行的地位。 然而，获得州立或国家银行牌照与成为事实上的类似银行的实体是不同的。让我们来看看加密平台寻求成为成熟银行的前景。 目录Why transform into a bank?The intersection of banks and crypto platforms新银行进入市场 阅读更多：报告称特朗普时代政策转变引发加密货币公司争夺银行牌照 为什么要转型成为银行？ 随着美国开始接受加密货币，这些公司转型为银行的机会更大。现代监管机构并不认为加密货币是完全不可接受的东西。路透社援引律师的话称，加密公司对加密货币的兴趣日益浓厚，它们正在谨慎地寻找新的机会。 SmartBiz, for example, acquired Centrust Bank, becoming the first fintech company to get a bank charter since 2021. This indicates a possible trend setting.  Earlier this month, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency reversed the banks’ anti-crypto stance, permitting banks to engage in cryptocurrency-related activity, including stablecoins operations, crypto custody, etc. First, the companies hope to obtain bank status to boost their credibility. It may attract new individual and corporate clients, as banks seem more trustworthy and familiar to them than cryptocurrency ecosystems. It opens new opportunities and allows companies to scale up substantially. Bank charter is associated with additional scrutiny, but on the other hand, it gives companies a more legitimate image that is important for business expansion. The second reason is that bank regulations pull crypto out of the grey zone, giving the companies a clearer legislative environment, thus providing a more predictable development trajectory and the opportunity to follow their strategies more confidently.  获得银行执照的另一个好处是可以直接获得客户的存款。没有它，加密货币公司必须借入资金并支付高额费用。有了客户的存款，公司的行动和发展可能会受到更少的限制。 银行与加密平台的交集 尽管区块链从第一天起就对银行持敌对态度（回想一下比特币创世区块所附带的信息），但银行和加密货币企业已经成功共存并塑造彼此的运营方式。 看来加密货币不再对银行构成生存威胁。银行采用了区块链解决方案，而加密货币平台则采用了许多银行的服务，例如贷款和汇款等更基本的业务。 传统银行出于各种原因使用区块链解决方案。分布式账本和智能合约基础设施使银行能够实现某些流程的自动化并降低成本，提高合规性和资金和数据的整体安全性，并提高结算速度，尤其是在跨境交易方面。值得一提的是，自动化不仅使服务更便宜，而且还消除了人为错误并防止了欺诈活动。 摩根大通和高盛等公司使用区块链来简化“了解你的客户”验证流程。国际银行联盟 Fnality International（包括巴克莱银行、汇丰控股和其他主要银行）使用区块链进行跨境交易。 中央银行数字货币（CBDC）将减少公民和中央银行之间的中介参与，同时不会阻止商业银行提供信贷等服务。 与此同时，加密货币平台在移动互联网普及率较高的农村无银行账户地区充当银行的角色。此类地区可以在撒哈拉以南非洲和一些亚洲地区找到。这些地区的居民大多使用加密货币进行汇款和储蓄。 新银行进入图片 Neobanks, digital-first online banks that offer traditional banking services, emerged in the early 2010s. Since then, they’ve proven to have advantages over traditional banks. For example, they boast a customer-centric approach and use peer-to-peer solutions. Neobanks also typically charge lower fees, provide user-friendly apps, and usually have a more favorable approach to providing credits/loans to clients.  Tens of millions of clients use digital banks, such as Chime or Revolut. According to Plaid, over 21% of people aged between 21 and 56 use neobanks as their primary checking account. 采用加密货币是合乎逻辑的下一步。Revolut 是一个著名的新银行例子，它除了支持股票交易、货币兑换和虚拟卡等其他功能外，还支持加密货币操作。 我们可能会看到更多加密货币公司成为银行，因为美国监管机构和企业都对这种发展感兴趣。很快，我们就会知道其他国家是否会效仿。 阅读更多：新银行正在利用区块链弥补资金缺口 | 观点

Compact Games NFT 从 1 月 31 日起推出其“虚拟游戏 CD”系列，供交易者铸造并在桌面和移动设备上运行。 Compact Games 在 NFT 市场 Magic Eden 上线，为交易者提供了 33 款独特游戏供选择，每种游戏都有四种稀有度：标准、青铜、白银和黄金。 Compact Games NFT 网站上展示的游戏具有街机风格的游戏玩法，类似于 Candy Crush 或 Flappy Bird 等经典手机游戏。展示的一些游戏包括 The Witch、Spirit Halloween、Shumii 和 Moonsheep。不仅如此，很多游戏似乎都从流行的加密图标中汲取了灵感，其中包括 Pengu Pong、Cryptoads、Flappy Pengu 和 Odd Toad Run 等游戏。 开发人员准备了总共 3333 张“虚拟游戏 CD”，交易者可以以 0.06 ETH (ETH) 的价格购买这些非同质化代币。Compact Games NFT 的铸造将于 1 月 31 日在 Abstract 主网上与其他流行的 NFT 一起开始。 ✳️ 链：@AbstractChain价格：0.06 ETH␠稀有度：4🎮 独特游戏：33🚀 启动板：@MagicEden铸造日期：1月31日准备好收集、玩耍和竞争吧！🕹️ pic.twitter.com/O86N1CPvlj– Compact Games 📀 (@compactgamesnft) 2025 年 1 月 27 日 你可能还喜欢：PENGU 在 Abstract 主网启动前上涨，但潜在的修正迫在眉睫 如何玩 Compact Games NFT？ 为了玩虚拟 CD，NFT 持有者需要使用任何提供商将他们的加密钱包连接到 Compact Games 虚拟控制台平台。然后，他们可以从可用的虚拟游戏 CD 列表中进行选择，并将游戏 CD 插入虚拟控制台以运行它。这种体验反映了在 90 年代和 2000 年代初期插入视频游戏 CD 在游戏机上玩游戏的过程。 因此，这款原本应该成为 80 年代背景的 PvPvE 提取射击游戏的游戏将永远不会发布。 阅读更多：Dr Disrespect 的 NFT 梦想游戏 Deadrop 关停