BNB Chain 推出 1 亿美元原生代币流动性新计划

Disclosure: The views and opinions expressed here belong solely to the author and do not represent the views and opinions of crypto.news’ editorial. Tokenization has become a buzzword, unfortunately, it’s failing to prove its value. Investors remain unconvinced, and inconsistent regulations are stalling progress. Too often, assets are being tokenized just for the sake of it, without providing any improvements in accessibility, efficiency, or liquidity. Tokenized portfolios on-chain sound sexy and exciting to crypto native investors, but that’s a small niche of the market. For tokenization to truly take off, it needs buy-in from institutional and retail investors who want to modernize traditional assets, and not just create digital twins of inefficient traditional products. You might also like:Tokenization as a funding backdoor for European founders | Opinion So far, the industry’s focus has been on compliance and replicating real-world assets onchain, but mainstream investors still lack compelling reasons to engage. Despite institutional interest from firms like BlackRock, adoption remains sluggish because the industry has failed to address core investment concerns. Tokenized assets are still difficult to trade, lack liquidity, and exist in a fragmented regulatory landscape. This complication and doubt cause traditional investors with big portfolios to not even bother with the space at all—some of whom see Bitcoin (BTC) as a Ponzi scheme. Institutional investors have to get involved in making some decisions around investing in cryptocurrency, but it will take time. Providing the proper education and tools is critical when understanding how to navigate tokenized assets confidently. The core reality check Tokenization should focus on expanding practical functionality for investors. Boston Consulting Group, in a recent white paper, projects in multiple scenarios that tokenization of assets could reach trillions of dollars of Amulet (AUM) by 2030. Real value means greater liquidity, better assessment options, increased transparency, and trust in a system that can smartly utilize these assets. Currently, when you hold these assets with major institutions and custodians, your options are extremely limited. In some cases, assets can be used as collateral, but the process remains convoluted and restrictive. For example, we’re not talking about crypto native investors that put $28.6 trillion worth of assets onchain. More so, pension fund managers, and I can’t imagine them using a MetaMask wallet to hold real-world assets tokens and utilize them in a smart contract to provide decentralized finance functionality. Tokenization presents a unique opportunity to transform traditional finance. By turning static assets into smart contracts, these tokens can automate a lot of financial processes and create new use cases not available in traditional finance. However, we cannot rely on the old legacy financial infrastructure: traditional custodians, fund managers, and administrators. According to the World Economic Forum, tokenization could unlock collateral mobility that has never been possible. The process remains costly and time-consuming,and neither institutional nor retail investors will engage. It’s time to turn this into a reality and commit to delivering real, tangible value to attract long-term adoption. Make it make sense Regulatory clarity remains inconsistent and has created a fragmented market. Jurisdictions like the Hong Kong Monetary Authority and Abu Dhabi Global Market are taking proactive steps, but a fragmented global landscape makes compliance a major challenge. For instance, if I want to tokenize an asset in the ADGM and ensure compatibility with a tokenized asset under the HKMA, or want to trade on a decentralized exchange, I would need to comply with both the ADGM regulations, where I am based, and the HKMA regulations. Now, imagine that there are not just two jurisdictions, but 150. When each has its own standards and rules, compliance is nearly impossible, and the dream of a seamless financial system is dead in the water. Large financial institutions and service providers are already working to find out how they can harmonize a digital asset like tokenization with a regulatory framework. We must push for a global regulatory framework for digital assets, rather than siloed frameworks of regional legislation. Without regulatory alignment, tokenized assets risk being confined to niche markets rather than achieving true global adoption. To reach financial democratization, we need utility Tokenization shouldn’t just be about digitizing old financial models; it should create new ways for assets to be utilized, traded more efficiently, and/or borrowed against. Tokenization alone is not enough. Assets must be made smarter and deliver tangible value to global investors, regulators, and service providers. Right now, many tokenized investment opportunities are still limited to qualified investors, which reinforces existing financial barriers rather than breaking them down. True democratization means opening up access to retail investors, not just tokenizing assets for institutions. This industry is still in its early stages, which means there’s still plenty of time to shape its future the right way. If regulators, jurisdictions, and innovators can align on the proper framework, the RWA tokenization sector could see massive growth by 2030. The future of tokenization depends on moving beyond the hype. Read more:Tokenization is the inevitable future of real estate | Opinion Rob Daykin Rob Daykinis a co-founder of Realize, a leading tokenization platform for real-world assets. He is at the forefront of driving growth, accessibility, and visibility in the evolving digital economy. With over 15 years of experience in fund administration and a vast knowledge of crypto and decentralized finance, Rob expertly bridges traditional finance with cutting-edge blockchain solutions. He has held senior positions at IQ-EQ and State Street Alternative Investment Solutions. Additionally, Rob is also the co-founder of Nakama Labs, a web3 venture fund and innovation hub focused on decentralized technologies.

欧洲央行行长克里斯蒂娜·拉加德表示，即使主权实体越来越多地转向比特币资产，该银行也不会考虑持有比特币储备。 拉加德长期以来一直对比特币 (BTC) 持怀疑态度，但对于使用比特币作为储备资产对冲通胀日益上升的趋势无动于衷。 在 1 月 30 日的新闻发布会上，拉加德表示，她“相信比特币不会进入欧洲央行总理事会任何一家央行的储备”。 阅读更多：挪威通过 MicroStrategy 股票增加对比特币的敞口

美国证券交易委员会正式公布了加密货币工作组成员名单，该工作组汇集了来自主要部门的顾问。 此前，美国证券交易委员会委员海斯特·皮尔斯 (Hester Peirce) 于 3 月 3 日在官方网站上发布了一份备忘录。根据备忘录，该工作组由代理主席马克·乌耶达 (Mark Uyeda) 办公室的工作人员以及该机构内多个部门的代表组成。 皮尔斯强调了该团队的经验和应对复杂的加密监管挑战的承诺，并指出加密工作组由知识渊博且敬业的员工组成，致力于为行业开发实用的监管解决方案。 她还强调，该团队将与其他 SEC 专家合作并与公众接触，制定有效的加密法规。 你可能还喜欢：SEC’s Hester Peirce pushes back on crypto regulation stance SEC 的新加密重点团队 该工作组包括首席参谋长理查德·加伯特 (Richard Gabbert)、首席法律顾问迈克尔·塞利格 (Michael Selig) 和首席政策顾问泰勒·阿舍 (Taylor Asher)。其他成员包括首席运营官苏梅拉·尤尼斯 (Sumeera Younis)、高级顾问兰登·津达 (Landon Zinda) 以及唐纳德·巴特尔 (Donald Battle)、伯纳德·诺兰 (Bernard Nolan) 和劳拉·鲍威尔 (Laura Powell) 等多位高级顾问。 Peirce 长期以来一直倡导在加密货币领域制定清晰、公平的监管规定。她的最新举措是在行业领袖不断呼吁提高监管透明度之后提出的。 这一发展符合 SEC 内部重新评估其对加密货币监管立场的更广泛趋势。在上一届政府的领导下，该机构加强了对加密货币公司的执法行动，并处以重罚。例如，仅在 2024 年，该机构就对加密货币企业处以了总计 46.8 亿美元的罚款，占该领域终生罚款的 68%。 然而，最近几个月出现了显著的变化。SEC 已经结束了对几家知名加密货币实体的调查，包括 Gemini、Coinbase、OpenSea、Uniswap Labs、Robinhood Crypto、Consensys 以及最近的 Kraken。此举表明，现任政府的监管方式更为宽松。 你可能还喜欢：海丝特·皮尔斯 (Hester Peirce) 的加密工作组将接管一切，但法院会接管吗？

由于链上数据显示最赚钱的投资者已经退出，特朗普官方模因币价格已跌至历史最低水平。 特朗普 (TRUMP) 的官方股价周六暴跌至 27 美元的低点，较历史最高点下跌约 63%。此次暴跌导致其市值从 140 亿美元跌至 53 亿美元。 TRUMP 表情包币 | 来源：crypto.news 大多数特朗普表情包币大鳄都抛售了该代币 链上数据显示，与大多数 meme 币一样，最大的鲸鱼已经退出了他们的仓位，只留下许多散户交易者承担责任。 Nansen 数据显示，获利最多的特朗普官方投资者获利 5300 万美元，已售出所有代币。第二位投资者获利 5200 万美元，已售出约 70% 的资产，价值 4400 万美元。 第三位投资者获利 4200 万美元，已卖出 3000 万美元。他仍持有价值 1200 万美元的代币，可能是因为他预计价格会反弹。其余获利的投资者已卖出大部分代币。 TRUMP 鲸鱼抛售代币 | 来源：Nansen 你可能还喜欢：Ripple 寻求在 SEC 案件中提交上诉摘要的截止日期为 4 月 这些抛售是因为在就职典礼之前代币涨幅过快。因此，清算是因为这些投资者明白，大多数 meme 币在最初的狂热结束后就会崩盘。此外，代币没有内在价值。 更多的数据显示，聪明钱投资者在经验上比散户投资者更加成熟。这些聪明钱投资者的数量从上周的340人下降到今天的130人。这些投资者持有的代币从近3000万枚下降到1440万枚。 特朗普精明投资者抛售 | 来源：Nansen 特朗普的潜在法律问题 特朗普和梅拉尼娅（MELANIA）表情包币的持续暴跌引起了华盛顿的关注。马萨诸塞州参议员伊丽莎白·沃伦和众议员杰克·奥金克洛斯一起呼吁当局调查特朗普代币。 他们担心市场操纵，以及外国势力可能购买代币并影响美国总统。目前尚不清楚美国政府道德办公室和美国证券交易委员会是否会展开调查。 假设对特朗普和梅拉尼娅的诉讼可能来自那些损失了钱的投资者。就在最近，受害投资者在 Hawk Tuah Girl 的 HAWK 代币崩盘后对其提起了诉讼。这些投资者指责她推广未经注册的证券。对特朗普和第一夫人的诉讼也会导致他们的 meme 代币被进一步抛售。 阅读更多：XRP 价格可能从 3 美元暴跌的 3 个技术原因

India’s Supreme Court has raised concerns over unregulated Bitcoin trading, comparing it to a refined form of Hawala during a recent bail hearing in a crypto-related case. According to local media, the observation came as the court questioned the absence of a clear regulatory framework for virtual currencies in the country. The bench, comprising Justices Surya Kant and N Kotiswar Singh, said the lack of formal rules around crypto assets had created uncertainty, leading to potential misuse. The remarks were made while hearing the bail plea of Shailesh Babulal Bhatt, who has been in custody since August 2023 for allegedly engaging in illegal Bitcoin trading. During the hearing, Bhatt’s lawyer, senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, argued that Bitcoin trading is not illegal in India, especially after the apex court’s 2020 ruling that struck down the Reserve Bank of India’s ban on banking services for crypto platforms.  Justice Surya Kant responded that his understanding of Bitcoin is limited but emphasised that, without regulation, Bitcoin trading closely resembles “a refined way of Hawala.”  For those unaware, Hawala is an informal, often illegal, money transfer system that operates outside traditional banking channels. The bench further noted that this wasn’t the first time the issue had come before the court. Notably, in a similar case two years ago, the court had specifically asked the Centre to clarify its policy on virtual currencies. You might also like:Crypto scammers nabbed in India for $700k fraud posing as a Japanese exchange The case in question dates back to February 2022, when the Supreme Court was hearing a petition to quash multiple FIRs filed against an individual accused of duping investors through a Bitcoin scheme. However, Kant said, there had been no progress since then. The absence of any update, despite repeated calls for clarity, has left the judiciary in a difficult position when dealing with such matters, he implied. Despite the ongoing uncertainty, India has taken some steps toward oversight of virtual digital assets. A tax regime introduced in 2022 imposes a 30% tax on crypto profits and a 1% tax deducted at source on all transactions above a certain threshold. Beyond taxation, virtual asset transactions were brought under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act in March 2023. Many platforms, including Binance, KuCoin, and Coinbase, have since registered with India’s Financial Intelligence Unit to comply with local rules. However, a broader regulatory framework remains absent. In a December 2024 response to Parliament, the government said there is currently “no fixed timeline” for introducing comprehensive rules on virtual assets. As previously covered on crypto.news, Ajay Seth, Secretary of the Department of Economic Affairs, addressed the delay in releasing a cryptocurrency discussion paper, originally scheduled for September 2024, during a recent policy roundtable. With major economies like the U.S. revisiting their stance on crypto, following policy shifts under President Trump, Seth said India would need to reassess its approach as well. “We were ready with a discussion paper, but we now need to recalibrate it due to these changes,” Seth said at the time. Read more:Crypto service providers eye Indian market as India signals shift in crypto regulation