Bitwise 与 Maple Finance 合作进军链上信贷市场

披露：此处表达的观点和意见仅属于作者，不代表 crypto.news 编辑的观点和意见。 当人们谈论 2024 年的零知识加密时，他们通常指的是一种以隐私为中心的用例，它依赖于区块链技术、加密货币、数字钱包和具有一定程度的 web3 知识的用户的组合。 你可能还喜欢：零知识模块化有助于扩展 web3 | 观点 零知识证明早在 1980 年代就已存在，远早于 web3 的出现。那么为什么要将其潜力限制在区块链应用中呢？传统公司可以（也应该）采用 ZK 技术，而无需完全采用 web3 基础设施。 从根本上讲，ZKP 解锁了在不透露该陈述背后的底层数据的情况下证明某事为真的可能性。理想情况下，证明者创建证明，验证者验证证明，并且这两方完全相互隔离以确保公平。就是这样。这个概念没有理由被困在 web3 的学习曲线后面。 大多数可以从 ZK 技术中受益的组织都没有使用区块链，甚至不知道 web3。这个行业还很年轻，许多人现在才熟悉比特币 (BTC) 和以太坊 (ETH)，更不用说第 2 层和第 3 层了。 尽管如此，ZKP 已经可以应用于各种现实世界的用例，并且它们不需要完全集成 web3 rails 来实现这一点。 您相信老虎机的支付能力吗？ 有了零知识证明，你就不必信任游戏运营商了。你可以尽情享受游戏，并且知道游戏是公平设计的，从而安心无忧。世界上的每一台数字赌博机都应该用零知识证明来设计；这对运营商和玩家来说都是有意义的。最好的部分是，玩家可以享受这些好处，而不用在脑海中想“web3”或“加密”这些词。 最近，康涅狄格州对 DraftKings 和 White Hat Gaming 的在线老虎机游戏处以 22,500 美元的罚款，因为该游戏在 2023 年 8 月的一周内没有向任何获胜者支付奖金——尽管当周的旋转次数超过 20,600 次。该游戏宣称每下注 1 美元将支付近 95 美分，因此该算法应该向下注 20,600 美元的玩家返还 19,570 美元。然而，玩家损失了 20,600 美元——这些钱全部归 DraftKings 所有。 这就是零知识证明可以发挥巨大作用的地方。ZKP 可以证明一款游戏在给定时间段内以特定命中率支付了一定数量的钱，而无需透露个人旋转或玩家身份。 这很好，但仍然存在验证证明的问题。需要有人确保 DraftKings 或任何博彩运营商根据所有必需数据正确构建证明。这可能是 DraftKings 自己，但我们不应该相信他们能够自行进行验证。监管机构或审计师可以做到这一点，但这可能会让 DraftKings 损失很多钱，然后这些钱会转嫁给客户。 在这种情况下，最好的选择是专门为快速且经济高效地验证证明而构建的公共去中心化网络。用户不必信任中心化实体，而是可以信任去中心化协议，该协议可确保恶意行为者（即那些可能试图验证错误证明的人）在行为不当时受到惩罚。 人工智能输出和可信度 人工智能的欺骗潜力已得到充分证实。然而，我们可以通过一些方法利用人工智能的创造力，同时仍然信任其输出。随着人工智能渗透到我们生活的方方面面，了解我们所依赖的人工智能训练模型是否合法变得越来越重要，因为如果它们不合法，我们可能会在不知不觉中改变历史。使用 ZKML 或零知识机器学习，我们可以避免这些潜在的陷阱，而对上链毫无兴趣的 web2 项目仍然可以利用这些好处。 最近，南加州大学与大屠杀基金会合作创建了一种名为 IWitness 的东西，用户可以直接对大屠杀幸存者的全息图像说话或打字。 这无疑是机器学习的强大应用。与大屠杀幸存者的全息图像互动，感觉就像在进行一场真正的对话，这种感觉非常奇妙和感人。但对于如此敏感的话题，全息图像底层算法生成事实信息就显得更加重要了。 Enter zero-knowledge proofs. If we were to reimagine this project, we might consider adding a “proof of algorithm output” where the user is able to see evidence that the responses they are seeing are based on a Natural Language Processing algorithm that was correctly trained on troves of historical transcripts and interviews with Holocaust survivors, ensuring that the information presented is accurate.  ZKPs make it possible to get proof of this input data and AI training without revealing the underlying information. Fact-checking the Holocaust information would also require perusing vast amounts of data, potentially requiring the end user to download or access large data sets and then spend hours reading or watching interviews. ZKPs allow the user to forgo this tedious and resource-intensive process.   In this case, we might trust USC to verify proofs for this particular project, but there are certainly more use cases with AI where the end user may not want to trust a centralized entity to both create and verify proof. When incentives to construct “fake” proofs and have them verified align, decentralized proof verification makes the most sense. ZK是一个面向所有人的无需信任的去中心化系统 我们不需要相信公司或机器人会告诉我们真相，因为我们有零知识。许多行业可以通过零知识区块链解决方案升级，即使他们对 web3 领域一无所知。 通过利用 ZK 证明验证，公司和机构基本上可以继续做他们在基础设施方面所做的一切。他们只需要创建一个简单的证明创建系统，然后使用像 zkVerify 这样的去中心化系统来处理证明验证。即使使用区块链，用户也不必担心这一点。 ZK 的未来将是巨大的，组织无需进行太多改变即可获得收益。他们只需即插即用即可。 阅读更多：Do androids dream of zero-knowledge? | Opinion John Camardo John Camardois the head of product management at Horizen Labs, where he focuses on applying zero-knowledge cryptography to solve real-world problems. He currently leads the product side of zkVerify, a chain-agnostic modular blockchain dedicated to efficiently verifying ZK proofs.

The collapse of a procedural Senate vote on stablecoin legislation (GENIUS Act) Thursday underscores the challenges of keeping cryptocurrency policy bipartisan. Once poised for smooth passage, the bill was derailed after last-minute Democratic objections and a lack of time to review final text — despite ongoing negotiations with Republican leadership. The 48–49 vote, with two Republicans joining Democrats in opposition, highlights deepening divisions over process and trust. While both parties publicly support regulating digital assets, the vote raises questions about whether crypto can remain a nonpartisan issue in a polarized Senate. In March, blockchain and digital asset attorney Marta Belcher confidently told crypto.news that support of crypto is nonpartisan: “I think it’s a misconception that crypto has become partisan. Many people on both sides of the aisle support crypto. I don’t think crypto is a partisan issue, just like ‘the Internet’ isn’t a partisan issue. I don’t think, in 2025, either party can be ‘anti’ an entire technology if they’re thinking seriously about America’s future.” If Belcher is right, then Democrats see support for crypto much differently than Republicans. If we look at what Democrats say about crypto regulations and topics they are concerned about in the sector, most of the time, we will find out they are not on the same page as Republicans. Take, for example, President Trump’s memecoin, Official Trump (TRUMP). The profits he and his family members generate from their DeFi business are becoming a major sticking point in bipartisan negotiations over stablecoin legislation. As Scott Galloway, a New York University Stern School of Business professor and co-host of the Raging Moderates podcast, recently told CNN, “The potential here for grift is just unprecedented.” Democratic Senators felt their Republican colleagues didn’t address the issue. Sen. Elizabeth Warren even encouraged the bill to ban sitting presidents from profiting off crypto ventures—an effort directly targeting Trump, who offered exclusive interactions with its top holders. Crypto in the Biden era  During President Joe Biden’s term, the cryptocurrency sector achieved several milestones. For example, Coinbase successfully became a NASDAQ-traded company. The outrightly crypto-skeptical Securities and Exchange Commission, then chaired by Gary Gensler, greenlighted Bitcoin exchange-traded funds. That wasn’t enough for the industry’s top bulls. SEC official Hester Peirce said on May 8 that the approval process for Bitcoin ETFs was “mismanaged” and told Bloomberg News that the delays alienated innovators. The crypto community also griped about alleged efforts to debank clients using digital assets, which they claimed was carried out by the FDIC and Department of Justice. The situation, colloquially known as Operation Choke Point 2.0, was scrutinized for being an overreach on the part of the former administration by Trump, Republican Sen. Cynthia Lummis and the Fed Chair, Jerome Powell. Gensler, a Democrat, filed numerous lawsuits against the cryptocurrency space during his term as SEC chair. The list includes Binance, Coinbase, Gemini, and Genesis, among others. One of the basic problems was the fact that Gensler insisted that most cryptocurrencies were nothing more than unregistered securities. This status was deemed prohibitive for innovation and current SEC officials prefer to view them as collectibles or commodities. Under Trump, the SEC dropped many of the charges filed initially under Gensler. Democrats seemingly decided to continue being cautious about crypto. Instead of fostering a free-breathing crypto experiment, they tried to play it slow to ensure no one was at risk.  However, this cautious approach can cost Democrats votes. A writer and CNN host, Van Jones, said that Democrats run people out of their party, noting that there are 50 million people owning crypto and going against them is “not smart.” CNN host @VanJones68 says, “Democrats ran people out of the party on crypto. 50 million people bought crypto. It’s a bet on a better future” pic.twitter.com/Ee8NlutNK1— Documenting ₿itcoin 📄 (@DocumentingBTC) January 6, 2025 Read more:US Senate votes against GENIUS Act after Democrat pushback Democrats and crypto today After tense negotiations that lasted for one week, the GENIUS ACT that should have regulated stablecoins in the U.S. failed in the Senate. Most Republicans, confident in their victory, tried to convince their colleagues to accept the bill as soon as possible and ignored the Democrats’ request to give them another week to prepare. People commenting on the news blamed Democrats for dedicating all their energy to blocking Republicans. The reality is that the genius act is actually not even a crypto bill if you really boil it down (must be non-yield bearing, BSA compliance etc), and the democrats still hate it—You really begin to wonder what they stand for— Jeff Park (@dgt10011) May 5, 2025 Jeff Park of Bitwise stressed that the bill wasn’t that radical and had high requirements for the stablecoin issuers. Warren, according to Axios, argued that the GENIUS Act lacked basic guardrails against corruption. She and other Democratic leaders reportedly looked at the numbers. Per the New York Times, Trump’s family members could profit from the $2 billion worth of their stablecoins that would be used for a foreign transaction involving an Abu Dhabi investment fund. And according to blockchain analytics firm Chainalysis, just 58 wallets have made over $10 million each from Trump’s memecoin so far. That’s $1.1 billion in profits. The majority of small holders (764,000 wallets) lost money. Sen. Richard Blumenthal, a Democrat, initiated a probe of the growing Trump crypto business and requested records from Fight Fight Fight LLC, a company behind the Official Trump token, and World Liberty Finance, a crypto enterprise launched by Trump’s sons. In addition to various crypto ventures, WLF is a stablecoin issuer. Blumenthal called Trump’s crypto business an unprecedented conflict of interest. Here’s what he wrote: “President Trump’s financial entanglements to the $TRUMP coin, as well as the attempted use of the White House to host competitions to prop up the value of $TRUMP, represents an unprecedented, pay-to-play scheme to provide access to the Presidency to the highest bidder.”  This is the message Democrats need to hammer:While Trump and his family are making hundreds of millions of dollars in their crypto grifts corruptly selling access to the presidency, he's raising prices on Americans, telling us to ration dolls, and decimating small businesses. pic.twitter.com/iDBd2RGTtu— Ahmed Baba (@AhmedBaba_) May 8, 2025 Democrats were trying to add provisions that would block Trump from making money via crypto before the end of the term, but the suggestion didn’t come to fruition. All these questions are serious, but they are seemingly not a priority for Republicans who want to move crypto legislation forward. “I have a sense that this is caught up in other issues,” Lummis said. Crenshaw’s take SEC Commissioner Caroline A. Crenshaw, also a Democrat, claims she represents “common sense” in the agency, while pushing forward the Gensler-era narratives that were criticized a long time ago. Crenshaw still sees cryptocurrencies as securities, which makes it difficult for crypto businesses to move forward. She also seems to oppose a deregulation approach to crypto. Crenshaw’s tenure finishes this year. Although she cannot block the SEC’s decisions, she may represent the views of Democrats on crypto for the remainder of 2025. If anyone wonders what the crypto industry will face in 3.5 years, if the Democrats win, read this dissent:https://t.co/9E6533dJDVTLDR – FAITH in the legacy of regulation by enforcement heralds a return to the Biden policies.THAT is why legislation is SO IMPORTANT.— Dave W (@daveweisberger1) May 9, 2025 Nevertheless, Belcher was right about the nonpartisan nature of the crypto agenda. Republicans seem to be more or less united on crypto progressivism. But some are equally dismayed by Trump’s bold crypto ventures as Democrats, who are seemingly steadfast in addressing crypto risks while protecting U.S. citizens.  Read more:Nic Carter revisits Operation Choke Point 2.0 after bombshell Silvergate testimony

Mantra 是一种流行的现实世界资产代币化货币，曾在 24 小时内暴跌超过 90%，但在创始人发表声明以及投资者逢低买入后，价格有所反弹。 Mantra (OM) 价格周二飙升逾 50%，成为涨幅最高的 100 大加密货币之一。在成交量大增的环境下，其盘中一度上涨至 0.82 美元的高点。 尽管如此，该代币的价格仍远低于其9.10美元的历史高点。它需要从当前水平上涨1000%以上才能重新测试其历史高点。 我们上周采访的 JP Mullin 在一份声明中坚称，OM 价格暴跌并非像一些分析师估计的那样是人为因素造成的。相反，他坚称暴跌是因为一家未具名的加密货币交易所的大额持有者被迫清算。 1) 非常感谢 MANTRA 团队在过去 36 多个小时里得到的所有支持。这些支持和鼓励来自多方——合作伙伴、投资者、朋友以及更广泛的 Web3 社区。谢谢大家。— JP Mullin (🕉, 🏘️) (@jp_mullin888) 2025 年 4 月 15 日 Mantra 将发布近期暴跌事件的分析报告，并宣布旨在建立信任和支撑其价格的举措。其中两项举措将包括代币回购和销毁机制，以彰显团队对项目的坚定承诺。 您可能还喜欢：Mantra价格暴跌：现实世界资产代币怎么了？ 代币回购是指项目使用其资金库中的资金在公开市场上购买代币。另一方面，代币销毁是指将代币转移到无法访问的钱包中，从而将其从流通中移除。 理论上，这些举措有助于通过减少流通中的代币来提升代币的价值，这通常会提高质押收益率。StakingRewards 数据显示，Mantra 的质押收益率为 5.4%，高于 Hedera (HBAR) 和 Tron (TRX) 等顶级代币。 Mantra 价格飙升可能是一个牛市陷阱 OM 价格走势图 | 来源：crypto.news OM价格反弹可能是因为一些投资者在经历了大幅下跌后看到了其价值。然而，此次反弹也存在可能是“死猫反弹”或“牛市陷阱”的一部分。 死猫反弹是指散户投资者逢低买入，导致下跌资产短暂反弹。大多数情况下，这种反弹是暂时的，资产通常会恢复下跌趋势。买入下跌的“刀子”是一种被称为“择时”的概念。 热门加密货币在下跌过程中也曾出现过类似的“死猫反弹”。这些代币包括 Terra Luna、Celsius 和 FTX Token。因此，尽管 Mantra 的价格飙升可能还会持续一段时间，但加密货币分析师建议保持耐心并采取合理的风险管理策略。 您可能还喜欢：担心内部人士抛售，Mantra DAO 将价值 2696 万美元的 OM 转入币安

日本游戏工作室 Gumi 已批准购买价值 660 万美元的比特币，以加倍投入区块链投资。 日本手机游戏工作室 Gumi Inc. 希望通过大量购买比特币 (BTC) 来加强其加密货币业务。这家在东京上市的公司在 2 月 10 日的新闻稿中透露，其董事会已批准在 5 月份之前购买价值 10 亿日元（约 658 万美元）的比特币的计划，以扩大其区块链节点运营业务。 据谷歌财经数据显示，消息一出，Gumi 股价上涨 3.6%，达到 454 日元（约合 3 美元）。Gumi 还透露，在截至 4 月的财年第二季度，它将成为“日本第一家以验证者身份参与质押协议 Babylon 的上市公司”。 “通过这一举措，我们旨在进一步加强我们的节点运营业务并增强我们在 web3 领域的影响力。” 十 你可能还喜欢：报告称，日本金融厅考虑将加密货币视为证券，为 ETF 铺平道路 Gumi 计划通过 Babylon 使用其持有的比特币进行质押，希望从比特币的潜在价格增长中获益，并从质押和验证者奖励中赚取收入。该工作室还计划定期评估其加密货币持有量，并在其财务报表中记录任何收益或损失。 Gumi 的举动进一步推动了亚洲公司采用加密货币的趋势。早在 2024 年 12 月，日本能源和汽车咨询公司 Remixpoint 就以 138 万美元的价格向其投资组合中增加了更多比特币，使其总加密货币持有量达到 2759 万美元。与此同时，Metaplanet 于 2024 年 4 月转向比特币标准，推动其股票跃升至日本交易量前 50 名，现在该公司的目标是到 2026 年达到 21,000 BTC。 阅读更多：日本科技巨头 Metaplanet 的目标是在 2025 年持有 10,000 枚比特币

在日本公司宣布进行 10 比 1 的股票分割以提高流动性后，Metaplanet 的股价下跌了 8% 以上。 日本投资公司 Metaplanet 宣布股票分割后，其股票在场外交易市场下跌 8.41%。在董事会批准增加股票数量并降低每股价格后，股价出现下跌。 Metaplanet 在 2 月 18 日的通知中表示，股票分割旨在提高流动性并扩大投资者基础。 “[...] 我们决定进行股票分割以降低每个交易单位的价格，从而提高流动性，扩大我们的投资者基础，并加强与更广泛股东的联系。” 元行星 你可能还喜欢：Metaplanet 筹集 7.45 亿美元扩大比特币持有量，竞标亚洲最大的加密货币交易 这一决定是在 2024 年 8 月进行反向股票分割之后做出的，当时 10 股股票合并为 1 股。Metaplanet 解释称，自那以后，股价一路飙升，投资者买入的成本高昂。正如 crypto.news 早些时候报道的那样，Metaplanet 已成为日本最热门的股票，在转向比特币后飙升了 3,600%。凭借 1,762 比特币 (BTC) 和大胆的 21,000 BTC 目标，它是亚洲最大的 BTC 股票。 To lower the entry barrier, the firm now wants to split each share into 10, effective April 1. Shareholders recorded as of March 31 will receive the additional shares. The move will increase the total number of issued shares from about 39 million to nearly 392 million, per the notice. The exercise price for stock acquisition rights will also be adjusted due to the split. For example, the price for the 13th to 17th series of stock acquisition rights will be reduced from 5,555 yen to 556 yen. Metaplanet noted that the stock split will not change its stated capital. 阅读更多：首席执行官表示，比特币的普及推动 Metaplanet 跻身日本前 50 名