数百名韩国官员持有总计 144 亿韩元的加密资产

Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only. TAC’s TOKEN2049 Dubai event drew 2,000+ attendees, spotlighting the growing EVM-to-TON ecosystem. Dubai, UAE –TAC, a purpose-built blockchain for EVM dApps to access TON and Telegram Ecosystem’s 1b+ user base, has announced the overwhelming success of its TOKEN2049 Dubai side event, “TAC Takeover: Sunset Swings with Agglayer,” held on 30 April 2025 at Topgolf Dubai. Supported by Title Partner, Agglayer; Gold Partner, The Open Platform (TOP); and Silver Partners, Boinkers, ZeroLend, and Tomo, the four‑hour soirée welcomed 2,063 registrants representing more than 1,600 companies for an evening of networking, swing challenges, and sunset views over the Emirates Golf Club skyline. “We brought together the sharpest minds across EVM and TON at TOKEN2049 Dubai. With 1 billion people on Telegram, it’s the most powerful distribution channel crypto has ever seen. We’re here to unlock it for EVM builders around the world,” said Marco, Co‑Founder & Growth Lead of TAC. Teams from leading blockchain protocols, venture capital firms, key opinion leaders, and top crypto media exchanged ideas throughout the night. Agglayer showcased its vision for unified cross‑chain liquidity, and together with TOP, Boinkers, ZeroLend, and Tomo hosted dedicated bays that remained at capacity from tee‑off to the final putt. The community‑driven Turtle Summoning campaign is about to hit $600 million in TVL, and more than 9,500 TAC‑Aligned members flooded crypto-X with thousands of TAC Pilled posts during TOKEN2049 Week, proof that TAC’s momentum extends well beyond the driving range. The TAC Takeover was staged on Friday, 30 April 2025 from 18:00 to 22:00 GST on Level 03 of Topgolf Dubai at Emirates Golf Club. A complete recap is available at https://lu.ma/uv0jvdgo. About TAC TAC is a purpose-built blockchain for EVM dApps to access TON and Telegram Ecosystem’s 1b+ user base. TAC makes it seamless for Ethereum dApps to be deployed on TON. EVM functionality and liquidity brought to the TON ecosystem enable builders to focus on consumer use cases. About TAC Takeover TAC Takeover is TAC’s global networking event series where they host high-value and immersive experiences for teams across ecosystems. Previous events include the highly popular Indoor Mini-Golf w/ TAC at Puttshack, Denver. Agglayer Agglayer is a neutral, cross-chain settlement layer that unifies liquidity, users, and state of aggregated chains, and posts finality to Ethereum. The goal is to unify all web3, regardless of VM or execution environment.The Open PlatformThe Open Platform (TOP) is a venture builder and investor for early-stage projects on the TON blockchain and Telegram. TOP provides a powerful toolkit of funding, expertise, and technology resources, streamlining access to critical tools like wallets, developer resources, SDKs, APIs, and marketplaces. TOP also develops and supports leading ecosystem products including the Wallet in Telegram, Tonkeeper, STON.fi, Getgems, and more. With this support and expertise, TOP enables developers and entrepreneurs to build scalable web3 products ready for widespread adoption.  ZeroLend ZeroLend is the leading lending market focused on L2s, LRTs, RWAs, BTCFi, and memecoins. Secured by Chaos Labs, Zokyo, Halborn, Peckshield, Sherlock, ImmuneFi, Cantina, Hypernative, Hexagate. Tomo Tomo Wallet supports EVM, Bitcoin, Solana, TON, and more on Telegram, iOS, Android, and Google Chrome. Users can track token sentiments (AI Alpha), swap cross-chain, gift tokens, on/off-ramp, and secure assets with social recovery. Boinkers Boinkers is a parody game that pokes fun at crypto culture in the most degenerate way possible. Boinkers is currently the #1 Social Gaming and Top Grossing app on Telegram, backed by a16z. Built for the absolutely unhinged… it’s not just a game, it’s a lifestyle. Read more:Dubai to accept crypto for government service payments in global first Disclosure: This content is provided by a third party. crypto.news does not endorse any product mentioned on this page. Users must do their own research before taking any actions related to the company.

加密行业正在经历重大的监管变化，促使 Coinbase 等行业巨头考虑申请银行牌照。 美国加密货币公司正越来越多地探索进入传统金融领域。4月22日，crypto.news联系了Coinbase，后者确认正在积极考虑获得美国银行牌照的可能性。 Coinbase 发言人在一封电子邮件中告诉 crypto.news：“Coinbase 正在积极考虑此事，但尚未做出任何正式决定。” 此举与 Coinbase 首席执行官 Brian Armstrong 之前的声明相呼应，他指出，根据其管理的消费者资金量，Coinbase 将成为美国第 21 大银行。 此外，该交易所并非唯一一家考虑采取此类举措的加密货币公司。4月21日，《华尔街日报》报道称，USDC发行商Circle和加密货币托管公司BitGo也在探索获得完整的银行牌照。这将使它们能够更像传统银行一样运营，提供贷款、接受存款等服务。 您可能还喜欢：德意志银行和渣打银行正在探索在美国更深层次的加密货币立足点：报告 银行牌照还能获得美联储的保护和存款保险，从而可能提高客户资金的安全。然而，获得此类牌照需要经过严格的监管审查，合规成本也很高。 到目前为止，唯一一家持有银行牌照的加密货币原生公司是 Anchorage Digital。首席执行官 Nathan McCauley 透露，该公司已花费数千万美元来满足监管要求。 您可能还喜欢：美国银行业律师：稳定币需要与银行类似的监管 美国准备监管稳定币和山寨币 在唐纳德·特朗普总统领导下，美国政府对加密货币的态度更加友好，而更多牌照的发放也随之而来。美国证券交易委员会（SEC）等监管机构正在采取更加宽松的监管方式，这在很大程度上要归功于特朗普的政治任命。 与此同时，立法者目前正在审查两项主要法案：《创世纪法案》和《稳定法案》。这些法案旨在为加密货币行业建立清晰的监管体系，预计将使合规公司受益。 For this reason, U.S. banks are also warming to the crypto business. In February this year, Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan revealed that the firm was considering launching its own stablecoin. Earlier, in January, Moynihan also advocated for integrating crypto payments into the banking industry. 您可能还喜欢：南森：Coinbase 可能成为 STABLE 法案下的最大赢家

The OCC has shifted its previously hands-off stance on crypto, allowing banks to buy and sell custody-held cryptocurrencies on behalf of customers. They are also allowed to provide crypto custody services. In a recent post, Acting Comptroller of the Currency and administrator of the federal banking system, Rodney Hood, declared that cryptocurrency is no longer simply a trend. Instead, it is considered a “transformation” by the federal agency. Therefore, the organization has decided to shift its previously skittish stance towards crypto by allowing banks to engage in financial activities related to cryptocurrencies. “We’ve confirmed that national banks and federal saving associations may engage in certain cryptocurrency activities responsibility, in order to serve their customers,” said Hood in a video statement. OCC-regulated banks may buy and sell assets held in custody and are permitted to outsource bank-permissible crypto-asset activities, including custody and execution services. https://t.co/0ScQdgNaS6 pic.twitter.com/J5dEkx4WUL— OCC (@USOCC) May 7, 2025 These activities include buying and selling crypto held in custody at their customer’s direction. Banks and federal saving associations are also granted the ability to outsource crypto custody and execution services to third parties. However, financial institutions must ensure these services comply with OCC’s safety standards and soundness criteria to ensure proper oversight and risk management. Additionally, OCC-regulated banks are allowed to provide other custody services to customers such as record keeping, tax, or reporting services related to cryptocurrency. “While a range of cryptocurrency and digital asset activities may be performed by banks and their third parties, I want to be clear that the OCC expect these activities to be conducted in a safe and sound manner and in compliance with applicable law,” said Hood. Read more:Trump-era policy shift sparks crypto firms’ push for banking licenses: report In a document issued by the OCC on May 7, the organization clarified their stance on cryptocurrency. The letter cited that banks may act in a fiduciary capacity and a sub-custodian to provide custody services, which are subject to appropriate third-party risk management practices. “The services national banks may provide in relation to the cryptocurrency they are custodying may include services such as facilitating the customer’s cryptocurrency and fiat currency exchange transactions, transaction settlement, trade execution, [record keeping], valuation, tax services, reporting, or other appropriate services,” wrote OCC. The Fed, OCC, and SEC: The pro-crypto shift in banking regulations The change in the OCC’s stance reflects a broader trend of federal organizations embracing crypto in the wake of the Trump administration friendlier stance towards the industry. Banks now have more freedom to get involved with the crypto industry following recent regulatory changes. In late April, the U.S. Federal Reserve announced that it has removed its requirement for state banks to give a notice before participating in crypto-related activities. Not only that, the Fed also withdrew its 2023 guidelines which limited how banks could deal with stablecoins. In addition, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, followed suit by retracting from two joint statements made that same year. In March this year, a number crypto firms were reportedly interested in applying for banking licenses to expand their businesses and potentially reduce borrowing costs. Not to mention, a bank charter would increase their legitimacy as a business operation in the eyes of customers. Last January, the Securities and Exchange Commission removed a rule that had forced banks holding crypto to list it as a liability, easing pressure on financial institutions. You might also like:Fed Governor: Banks and non-banks should be able to issue stablecoins

披露：本文不构成投资建议。本页面内容及资料仅供参考。 随着欧洲为 MiCA 做准备，里加的 UN:BLOCK 2025 将成为欧洲大陆区块链和 web3 创新最具影响力的舞台。 今年春天，里加将举办欧洲首屈一指的区块链和 Web3 盛会之一：备受期待的 UN:BLOCK 区块链与加密货币大会。该大会将于 2025 年 4 月 22 日至 23 日在标志性的 Hanzas Perons 大厦举行，旨在汇聚全球创新者、投资者、政策制定者和科技远见者。 随着欧洲即将全面实施加密资产市场监管局 (MiCA)，UN:BLOCK 拥有独特的优势，将成为引领这一监管里程碑的关键平台。从充满活力的初创企业到机构领导者，此次会议将提供重要的见解、强大的交流机会，并对欧盟加密货币的未来产生真正的影响。 UN:BLOCK 2025 将邀请来自全球知名区块链公司、主流交易所、金融科技先锋和监管机构的 100 多位杰出演讲嘉宾。主要嘉宾包括 Dorian Vincileoni（库币）、Vishal Sacheendran（币安）、Ksenia Drobyshevskaya（比特城）、Uldis Teraudkalns（Paybis）和 Marine Krasovska（拉脱维亚银行），以及众多致力于塑造 Web3 未来的人士。 除了主题演讲和专家小组讨论外，本次大会还将提供互动环节、现场创业公司推介、专属交流中心以及深入的研讨会，涵盖 AI x Web3、代币化资产、加密支付和下一代 DeFi 等主题。UN:BLOCK 里加峰会旨在不仅提供信息，更赋能行业，是符合 MiCA 标准的欧洲构建下一波区块链解决方案的理想之地。 无论您是投资者、创始人、开发者，还是仅仅对 web3 的未来感到好奇，UN:BLOCK 2025 都是您了解数字经济转型的前沿阵地。 使用代码CN35即可享受35%折扣。门票现已在官方网站发售。 阅读更多：亚洲和欧洲加密货币股票暴跌，盘前交易预示美国市场将进一步下跌 披露：此内容由第三方提供。crypto.news 不认可本页面提及的任何产品。用户在采取任何与该公司相关的行动之前，应自行进行研究。

Mortgage-backed securities massively contributed to the 2008 financial crisis. According to some observers, Bitcoin, created as a response to this crisis, started to resemble MBS as a large part of the Bitcoin market is now represented by “paper” Bitcoin or sophisticated Bitcoin derivatives. How accurate is that? Should we get ready for another fundamental shakeout? Table of ContentsCrisis of 2008From Bitcoin whitepaper to “paper” Bitcoin Crisis of 2008 The 2008 financial crisis was a product of several simultaneous misfortunes and disproportions. One of the factors that made it possible was the development of extremely complex trading instruments. Securitization is the term that describes the contractual debt-based pools of money related to these debts (mortgage, auto loans, etc) sold to third parties in the form of securities. Mortgage-backed securities saw sharp traction, but they turned out to be not collateralized properly. Mortgages were given to people with little to no proof of financial solvency. MBS associated with subprime mortgages became the dynamite for the world economy during the housing bubble boom in 2007–2009. Banks, hedge funds, and mortgage lenders saw bankruptcies, liquidations, bank runs, etc.  The results of the 2008 financial crisis included a high unemployment rate, crashed markets, an inflation spike, a decline in household wealth, and the number of bailouts. The governments saved the banking system while most of those responsible for the crisis were not punished. An unknown innovator came up with an alternative electronic cash system, not controlled by the banks and governments, known as Bitcoin. Read more:What is a genesis block? From Bitcoin whitepaper to “paper” Bitcoin While Bitcoin is technically independent from any entity as its network is decentralized, governments and corporations eventually found a way to influence Bitcoin to some extent, as they have the power to funnel millions of dollars into Bitcoin.  As public awareness about Bitcoin grew, its price went higher. Investments from institutions and governments were mostly seen positively as they were to increase Bitcoin’s spot price and bring it closer to mass adoption. Soon, Bitcoin started to adopt traditional financial instruments to allow profit from bitcoins you don’t hold. In 2017, Bitcoin futures became available. Bitcoin margin trading was already in place by that time. 2024 saw Bitcoin ETF approval.  The introduction and growing adoption of Bitcoin derivatives created patterns that remind some of the MBS movements before the 2008 financial crisis outbreak. These days, certain pension funds in the U.S., UK, and Australia invest in Bitcoin through ETFs, just as 17 years ago they were investing in MBS. Just like 17 years ago, Bitcoin derivatives are so sophisticated that risk management is limited. The same was the case with MBS when no one knew exactly who owned what, as the securities were bundled with other instruments and sort of blended. Today fear of missing out fuels institutional investors the similar way it was in 2008. Academic researchers Rahool Kapoor and Natalya Vinokurova released a piece this March, in which they warned readers of inaccurate analogies. They write that comparing Bitcoin to gold is as risky as comparing MBS to bonds. Bitcoin is similar to gold in many ways, whether it is scarcity or high returns, but authors say that Bitcoin may fail the way MBS did after ungrounded trust in this asset mixed with FOMO.  These researchers don’t try to explain why many believe that Bitcoin is not only similar to gold but superior in many instances. Nevertheless, their criticism of the processes surrounding Bitcoin these days resembles some (rare) opinions across Crypto Twitter, signaling that too much paper Bitcoin on the market may end up badly.  Paper Bitcoin means that when two people use an exchange so that one will lend their bitcoins to another, the real exchange between the two may not happen. Instead, an exchange will display both persons as having these bitcoins. It distorts the data and engages people in trading uncollateralized assets. It's simple.Short sellers of $IBIT, for example, are creating paper Bitcoin.This happens through Operational Short Selling — where market makers borrow ETF shares and short them, while the fund itself holds real BTC. The result? More claims on Bitcoin than actual coins. https://t.co/G4pxLnFVRV— Josh Man (@JoshMandell6) June 8, 2025 Some believe that paper Bitcoin trading is the reason why the BTC price is still far from being one million or even half of it despite multi-million purchases by Bitcoin treasuries. However, it’s worth saying that Bitcoin treasuries use OTC desks to avoid immediate impact on the markets. My thesis is that if the financial system heals then bitcoin treasury companies will probably collapse. If it doesn't heal the banks and the treasury market are close to collapse— DarkSideOfTheMoon (@DarkSide2030_) June 9, 2025 Some in the crypto community oppose Bitcoin treasures for various reasons, including centralization, paper asset trading, lack of usability, insecurity, etc. The narrative surrounding Bitcoin has shifted from the Wall Street denial to a basis for another unsafe asset traded by it. Time will show how sustainable Bitcoin will be in the event that its derivatives fall apart. As of June 2025, only a few experts express concern about paper Bitcoin trading. Some think that obligatory proof-of-reserves would have lowered the risks associated with paper Bitcoin. However, it requires changing the practice of how exchanges act. Others stick to Bitcoin self-custody and don’t trust their funds to Bitcoin treasury companies and other centralized entities. You might also like:Michael Saylor won’t publish Strategy’s proof of reserves: “It’s a bad idea”