加密货币中的“when lambo”是什么意思？加密货币术语解释

Elon Musk raised concerns about whether Fort Knox is still holding $425 billion worth of gold. The posts reignited an old conspiracy theory about gone gold and sparked discussion about the advantages of Bitcoin. Donald Trump said he will audit “the fabled Fort Knox.” 目录诺克斯堡是否定期接受审计？比特币进入讨论伯恩斯坦分析称美国将需要黄金来购买比特币 作为政府效率部负责人，马斯克最近一直忙于审查政府机构。诺克斯堡是他大胆目光的另一个目标，马斯克发布了一篇 X 帖子，称“对诺克斯堡进行现场视频演练会很酷”。 Sen. Mike Lee fueled the discussion when he replied to Musk that despite being a senator, he was denied access to Fort Knox on multiple occasions without a proper cause. Musk replied that the American public was the true owner of gold stored in Fort Knox and asked if someone could confirm the gold was there. Who is confirming that gold wasn’t stolen from Fort Knox?Maybe it’s there, maybe it’s not.That gold is owned by the American public! We want to know if it’s still there. https://t.co/aEBXK1CfD6— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) February 17, 2025 讨论仍在继续，许多人表示支持对美国最大黄金储备进行公开审计的想法。诺克斯堡黄金储备库拥有 147 金衡盎司的黄金，比美国任何其他储备库都要多。 英格兰银行金库内部（2012 年）。如今金库已经空无一人。我们想要诺克斯堡内部的类似视频。pic.twitter.com/oskaZwz3kE— zerohedge (@zerohedge) 2025 年 2 月 19 日 诺克斯堡黄金失踪是一个古老的阴谋论，其根源在于该储备库透明度极低。即使按照军事基地的标准，进入这个仓库也是很困难的。 The inability to make sure gold is present in the depository raises questions about accountability and transparency standards revision. 诺克斯堡是否定期接受审计？ 定期进行审计。美国政府每月发布报告，详细说明每个仓库储存的黄金数量。黄金失踪理论的支持者不相信这些报告，他们想获得证据。然而，不允许游客进入诺克斯堡的限制性政策只会让人们更加怀疑。 您可能看到过这样一条引人注目的声明：诺克斯堡 50 年来从未接受过审计。这与事实相差无几。 事实上，诺克斯堡最后一次公开审计是在 1974 年 9 月 24 日，当时几名国会议员和记者获准进入仓库。他们进入仓库，检查黄金并拍照。诺克斯堡上一次进行这样的审计是在 1943 年。 1974 年访问的新闻稿宣称，这次活动标志着长期以来禁止访客政策的改变。据此，国会视察遵循了福特总统的新开放政策。然而，正如我们今天所知，访问结束后不久，诺克斯堡的大门就关闭了，并且在接下来的 40 多年里一直关闭。 During the previous Donald Trump presidency, in 2017, then-Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin managed to obtain permission to visit the bullion depository accompanied by Kentucky elected officials. Unlike the 1974 inspection, this event was pretty private, with no media present.  Mnuchin received backlash for the inappropriate use of military aircraft to travel to Fort Knox, spending an additional $9k of the taxpayers’ money.  The fact that the visitation took place on the very day of the total solar eclipse, which Mnuchin observed from the roof of Fort Knox, which is situated close to the Path of Totality, one of the best points to look at the eclipse, raised additional criticism. The photos of him and his peers in front of golden bricks were published in 2018. This tour to Fort Knox hardly adheres to the criteria for audit. 没有证据表明诺克斯堡金矿有任何部分失踪。然而，缺乏透明度和明确的责任制为猜测和替代解决方案创造了良好的氛围。 比特币进入讨论 黄金经常被拿来与比特币作比较，尤其是现在，国家黄金储备不像比特币储备那样热门。难怪无法验证黄金储备的一致性在加密社区引发讨论。 比特币支持者表示，无论诺克斯堡黄金是否安全，比特币这种资产都不会引发任何这些担忧。 你可能还喜欢：IREN CEO: Bitcoin will beat gold in terms of market cap by 2030, reaching a $1,000,000 price More and more experts claim Bitcoin is better than gold. In light of the Fort Knox case, Bitcoin showcases higher transparency and ease of user and transportation. It’s much easier to cross the border with $5 million worth of Bitcoin than gold or cash. More than that, the ownership of Bitcoin is verifiable by any person with a device connected to the Internet. The Fort Knox situation reminds us that we don’t have such a possibility with gold. More than that, more traditional assets like Bitcoin ETFs or ETPs are as transparent as Bitcoin. Bradley Duke of Bitwise took to X to remind everyone why Bitcoin is much more trustworthy than gold. He said why trust when you can verify? Don't trust, verify.For decades there hasn't been an independent audit of the gold bullion kept at Fort Knox – the largest treasure ever amassed. Should the American people, who nominally own this treasure, just trust their successive governments?在 Bitwise，我们相信……pic.twitter.com/8DKSaY676n— Bradley Duke (@BradleyDukeBTC) 2025 年 2 月 18 日 伯恩斯坦分析称美国将需要黄金来购买比特币 比特币最大投资者可能担心金库中黄金短缺的原因之一是，美国政府最终会开始出售黄金以获取更多比特币。 伯恩斯坦分析师 Gautam Chhugani 表示，如果建立战略性比特币储备，美联储将不得不寻找资金来购买比特币。它可能会发行债券（这与设立战略性比特币储备的既定目标背道而驰）或出售部分黄金储备。 A livestream of Fort Knox would be 🔥🔥pic.twitter.com/hFJXMnEjvy— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) February 20, 2025 美国总统注意到了马斯克的担忧。2 月 20 日，马斯克发布了一段与特朗普的合影，称他们将视察“传说中的诺克斯堡，以确保黄金在那里”。特朗普微笑着补充道：“如果黄金不在那里，我们会非常沮丧。” 你可能还喜欢：再见零钱？埃隆·马斯克的 DOGE 称美元太贵了，无法制造

Curve Finance 创始人 Michael Egorov 推出了一个名为 Yield Basis 的新项目，旨在解决去中心化金融中的无常损失。 据 The Block 获得了一份宣传资料，该项目已成功筹集 500 万美元资金，代币估值为 5000 万美元。Yield Basis 旨在为代币化的比特币和以太币持有者提供解决方案，帮助他们从做市中获得收益，同时降低与无常损失相关的风险。 该轮融资超额认购了 15 倍，仅两周就筹集了 500 万美元。这笔资金的估值为 5000 万美元，其中 10% 的代币供应量（1 亿枚 YB 代币）出售给了投资者。这些代币将经历六个月的悬崖期，随后是两年的线性归属期。 去年 7 月，Egorov 在接受 crypto.news 采访时表达了他对 DeFi 生态系统的立场，“我强烈反对 DeFi 领域没有创新的说法。创新确实存在！只是市场对它的认识不够[…]” 你可能还喜欢：Curve Finance 推出新的 DeFi 借贷合约 流动性供应的创新方法 Egorov 向 The Block 证实了融资消息和项目细节。他解释说，Yield Basis 目前处于“生产测试”阶段，正在进行审计和测试。全面推出还需要更多时间，但该平台有望通过对自动化做市商的创新修改来减少无常损失。 该项目的代币分配计划将总供应量的 30% 分配给社区激励，25% 分配给团队，其余部分用于开发储备和合作。据 Egorov 称，Curve 技术许可可能用于支持流动性池，尤其是 Curve Finance 的稳定币 crvUSD。 Crypto.news 曾报道称，TON 基金会在此次发布之前已与 Curve Finance 合作，以促进收益代币交换并优化交换流程。 阅读更多：Curve Finance 创始人数百万美元贷款后 CRV 价格暴跌 25%

SWEAT, a web3 platform that rewards its users for physical activity, has unveiled a new artificial intelligence-powered agent, and added multichain access. The new artificial intelligence agent dubbed Mia, short for ‘Movement in Action’, eyes scalability for the consumer crypto market, with users able to swap, bridge and manage crypto rewards across multiple chains. NEAR.AI powered Mia will be accessible on top blockchain networks including Ethereum, Base, BNB Chain and Arbitrum. Amid web3 adoption, the multichain integration expands the utility of SWEAT’s native token, $SWEAT. Users can now use the token for gas fees, turning physical movement into usable crypto rewards—a move that enhances utility and lowers entry barriers. Mia enables consumers across multiple networks to experience the benefits of the sweat economy. Read more:Changpeng Zhao calls for AI agents to focus on utility instead of launching tokens Mia offers a chat-based, user-friendly experience designed to make cross-chain interactions feel seamless. “What makes this moment so powerful is the scale,” said Oleg Fomenko, the co-founder of SWEAT. “Both in terms of reach and potential, SWEAT is pushing the boundaries of what’s possible by combining AI and chain abstraction to create a seamless, multichain experience, making crypto more usable, accessible, and impactful at a global level.” SWEATt, which boasts 20 million mobile users, initially announced the unveiling of AI-powered personal agents at EthDenver in February. The addition of the agents to the Sweat Wallet app, the platform said at the time, aimed at incentivizing onboarding of web2 users to web3. Lowering of the entry barrier is key to this goal, and personalized approach gives users this. Mia, beyond accelerating adoption, boosts engagement and ensures retention. “SWEAT is delivering a Web3 x AI use case with true utility, showing how AI and chain abstraction together can provide novel opportunities to everyday people. Mia and $SWEAT Wallet bring the power of NEAR technology to millions of users,” said Illia Polosukhin, chief executive officer and co-founder of NEAR Protocol and NEAR.AI. Fomenko is set to showcase Mia and its multichain functionality on May 9, 2025 at the Dubai E-Sports Festival. You might also like:Space and Time launches ZK mainnet to power smart contract data

Zerebro co-founder Jeffy Yu was found alive in his parents’ home after evidently faking his suicide on a pump.fun livestream. As a result, his tribute meme coin LLJEFFY has fallen by 40%. According to a report by local news outlet The San Francisco Standard, Jeffy Yu was confirmed to be alive and living in his parents’ home, five days after the 23-year-old crypto mogul seemingly took his own life on a livestream. On-chain traders have speculated that Yu faked his own death as a way to depart from the crypto space. Especially after Yu’s obituary on the memorial platform, Legacy was removed a few days after it was published. Not only that, on-chain activity shows that there have been multiple transactions linked to Yu’s wallet after his alleged death. On May 9, a reporter from the San Francisco Standard confirmed that Yu was not dead. Instead, he had been living in a two-story home with his parents. Yu declined to provide any commentary about the false reports of his death and how he benefited from it. However, the Zerebro (ZEREBRO) founder said that he would be moving his parents out of the home within a week due to fearing that other people would be able to track down his whereabouts. “I’ve been doxxed. I’ve been harassed. If you can find me, other people can find me,” said Yu. Price chart for LLJEFFY, Zerebro co-founder Jeffy Yu’s legacy meme coin, May 9, 2025 | Source: DEX Screener According to DEX Screener, the Solana (SOL)-based meme coin LLJEFFY, created to honour Yu’s legacy, has fallen more than 40% following the news of Yu being alive. A far cry from its previous high when the token skyrocketed as high as 2,115% after news of Yu’s livestreamed suicide began to circulate. At the moment, the token has accumulated a market cap of $2.1 million. “If you’re reading this, it’s because my 72-hour deadman’s switch triggered, so I’m not here, at least physically,” said the Zerebro co-founder in a scheduled blog post linked to the meme coin. “This is a legacoin, my final art piece. $LLJEFFY,” he wrote. On the other hand, Yu’s original staple token, ZEREBRO, has been on the rise. In the past 24 hours of trading, the token has gone up by 22.3%. It is currently valued at $0.048. In the past few days the token has also suffered a similar downfall to its “legacoin” counterpart, dropping by nearly 10% in the past week and declining by 34.8% in the past two weeks. Price chart for ZEREBRO in the past few days of trading, May 9, 2025 | Source: crypto.news You might also like:Fake ‘Hong Kong coin’ promoted by chief executive impersonator account Controversy surrounding Zerebro founder Jeffy Yu’s ‘suicide’ On May 4, Zerebro co-founder Jeffy Yu was thought to have committed suicide. A video broadcast on meme coin launch platform Pump.fun showed Yu smoking a cigarette before shooting himself in the neck. The video was then shared multiple times on social media platform X. Two days later, Yu’s obituary was published on the memorial platform Legacy. However, many traders suspected Yu had faked his own death after on-chain data showed that his wallet was still actively making transactions. Analytics platforms like Bubblemaps and Lookonchain revealed that the LLJEFFY deployer and associated wallets were actively trading and burning tokens after Yu’ alleged death. Not only that, but an unverified letter was found indicating that his death had been staged. Allegedly written by Yu, the letter stated that the Zerebro founder had faked his death as he believed it was the “only viable exit from persistent harassment, blackmail, and threats.” You might also like:On-chain clues spark speculation Zerebro founder Jeffy Yu isn’t dead after all

DeFi 能在过时的金融法规下生存吗？专家表示，强迫去中心化平台采用为银行设计的合规模式将是灾难性的，这也证明了为什么政策制定者必须重新考虑他们的做法。 目录参议院投票废除国税局规则美国国税局规则及其废除经济影响——推动 DeFi 转入地下？DeFi 监管应如何运作美国加密政策是否陷入了政治周期？ 参议院投票废除国税局规则 美国政府与去中心化金融之间长期存在的紧张关系又到达了关键时刻。 3 月 4 日，参议院以 70 比 27 的压倒性多数票通过了一项罕见的两党一致决议，废除了美国国税局的一项规定，该规定将对去中心化交易所和 DeFi 协议施加传统的财务报告要求。 一旦该规则生效，将迫使开发商和 DeFi 平台向美国国税局报告加密交易，实际上将它们视为传统金融中介机构。 该决议现在将提交众议院进行另一次投票，然后才能送到唐纳德·特朗普总统的办公桌上。由于特朗普的人工智能和加密专家戴维·萨克斯已经表示支持废除该法案，该法案似乎很快就会成为法律。 加密货币倡导者认为这是金融隐私和创新的重大胜利，但由于众议院投票仍未完成且监管不确定性挥之不去，围绕 DeFi 法律地位的争论远未结束。 为了探讨其影响，crypto.news 独家采访了 1inch (1INCH) 的首席合规官 Hedi Navazan，1inch 是该领域最著名的 DeFi 聚合器之一。 美国国税局规则及其废除 美国国税局现已废除的规则试图对 DeFi 协议施加传统的财务报告义务，实际上将它们归类为经纪人。 Under this requirement, decentralized platforms would have been forced to report gross proceeds and user transaction details — even though they do not hold user funds or function as financial intermediaries. 该规则由拜登政府出台，作为推动加密货币领域税收合规的更广泛举措的一部分，旨在作为解决未报告的加密货币交易造成的预计年度税收缺口的措施之一。 根据巴克莱银行 2022 年的分析，美国国税局征收的税款与加密货币交易所欠税款之间的差距每年可能高达 500 亿美元。 财政部预计，通过扩大经纪人的定义，政府可以在未来十年内挽回 39 亿美元的损失。 然而，该提案遭到了强烈反对，因为 DeFi 的结构设计使得合规几乎不可能。Navazan 认为，美国国税局从根本上误解了 DeFi 的运作方式。 “这项提议反映了一种误导性的急于实施监管的做法，而没有清楚了解所涉及的技术复杂性。它忽略了一个事实，即许多去中心化金融协议（包括去中心化交易所聚合器）并不托管用户资产，这使得应用传统经纪商式监管的概念在技术上不可行。” One of the biggest concerns raised by industry leaders was that the rule would have required software developers and smart contract creators to report tax data they had no access to.  Unlike centralized exchanges such as Coinbase or Binance, DeFi platforms rely on self-executing smart contracts running on public blockchains, meaning there is no company managing user accounts or holding customer funds.  Forcing them to act as brokers would have been akin to demanding that an open-source protocol collect and store user information it was never designed to handle. 虽然税收合规一直是监管机构关注的重点，但安全仍然是 DeFi 最紧迫的问题之一。仅在 2023 年，黑客就从 DeFi 平台窃取了超过 18 亿美元，其中备受瞩目的漏洞影响了 Euler Finance、Atomic Wallet 和 Curve Finance。 Navazan 认为，监管工作应该优先解决这些弱点，而不是只关注税收。 “对于 DeFi 的未来来说，更紧迫的是为去中心化自治组织制定连贯的治理框架，并为安全实践提供适当的指导。监管重点应放在制定智能合约安全标准、识别恶意代币以及保护用户免受攻击上。不幸的是，这些关键领域的监管监督存在重大漏洞，尽管黑客继续窃取资产，恶意代币激增，但注意力似乎不成比例地集中在税收上。” 经济影响——推动 DeFi 转入地下？ 行业领导者越来越担心过度监管可能会导致 DeFi 活动退出美国，就像中心化交易所已经发生的情况一样。 纳瓦赞警告称，严厉或模糊的政策无助于促进合规——它们只会阻碍创新。 “将中心化金融监管强加于 DeFi 可能会带来意想不到的后果，包括迫使加密交易转入地下或转移到离岸司法管辖区。一个主要风险是过度的监管负担将迫使 DeFi 创新离开美国，就像许多加密公司迁往迪拜、瑞士和列支敦士登等司法管辖区的情况一样。” 该行业已经出现了一些引人注目的退出案例。2023 年，美国最大的加密货币交易所 Coinbase 宣布，由于监管不确定性，它正考虑将总部迁至海外。Gemini 也效仿了这一做法，以应对缺乏明确的美国框架。 即使是 DeFi 协议——尽管没有实体总部——也开始将其开发团队和法人实体转移到更有利的司法管辖区。 积极监管的另一个意想不到的后果是加密隐私工具的兴起，这可能会使税收执法更加困难。 The U.S. Treasury’s sanctions on Tornado Cash (TORN), a privacy protocol, did not eliminate demand for anonymous transactions — it simply pushed users toward alternative platforms. Since the ban, new privacy-focused DeFi protocols have emerged, many of which are now being built beyond U.S. regulatory reach. Navazan believes that without a more balanced approach, the government risks losing control over the very industry it seeks to regulate. “The lack of clear regulations is already making institutions hesitant to fully engage with DeFi, as traditional banks and financial players require legal certainty before committing resources. However, institutional appetite for DeFi is growing, with major players like JPMorgan’s ONYX project exploring tokenized assets and blockchain-based settlements.” 尽管存在监管不确定性，DeFi 仍继续以高收益机会吸引投资者，一些协议提供的回报率高达 27-30%，而 Navazan 警告称，过度监管也可能导致逃税行为增加。 “尽管这种收益率的可持续性值得商榷，但现实是它们继续吸引着投资者。如果严格的报告要求将 DeFi 活动推向地下或不受监管的市场，税务机关可能会完全失去对交易的了解，最终减少他们想要征收的税收收入。” DeFi 监管应如何运作 随着 IRS 规则的废除，DeFi 平台不再面临被迫采用中心化报告模式的直接威胁。然而，这并不意味着就不需要建立一个可行的监管和税收框架。 现在的挑战是政策制定者能否制定出符合 DeFi 去中心化架构的法规，而不是试图将过时的金融模型改装到旨在自主运行的系统上。 Navazan 认为，监管机构不应该施加去中心化协议无法满足的报告要求，而应该专注于区块链原生的合规解决方案。 “更有效的 DeFi 税收政策应该专注于利用区块链技术本身，而不是试图强制 DeFi 协议遵守经纪人式的规定。税务机关不应依赖 DeFi 平台来收集和报告用户数据，而应使用与这些平台的去中心化性质相符的基于区块链的合规解决方案。” 一种越来越流行的方法是使用链上分析工具进行税务执法。Chainalysis 和 Elliptic 等公司提供跟踪软件，使监管机构能够监控交易并发现潜在的逃税行为——而无需强迫 DeFi 平台承担合规角色。 Navazan 强调了 1inch 在实施自我监管工具方面所做的努力，作为该行业如何采取积极措施提高安全性和合规性的一个例子。 “一种潜在的解决方案是使用链上分析工具来追踪交易并识别非法活动。例如，1inch 已经通过 1inch Shield API 实施了自我监管措施，其中包括钱包筛选和黑名单以增强安全性。然而，这些工具并不能取代对明确、可执行的监管框架的需求。” Another possible model is permissioned DeFi, where institutional players interact with vetted liquidity pools that meet specific compliance standards.  Some DeFi projects are already developing institutional-friendly solutions that integrate risk monitoring and pre-approved pools with verified participants, ensuring compliance without entirely sacrificing decentralization. Navazan 认为，对于寻求监督同时维护 DeFi 核心原则的监管机构来说，这是一种潜在的妥协。 “美国国税局不应该试图强加不可行的经纪人报告义务，而应该探索符合 DeFi 去中心化架构的区块链原生税务报告机制。区分无需许可和需要许可的 DeFi 的分层监管方法可以提供更平衡的解决方案。” 这种模式将允许监管机构专注于 DeFi 与传统金融直接互动的领域（例如稳定币发行人和机构流动性池），同时允许完全去中心化的协议在没有繁重的合规要求的情况下运行。 美国加密政策是否陷入了政治周期？ 美国的加密政策一直在不断变化，随着每一届政府的更迭而变化，创造了一个不可预测的环境，使得长期业务规划几乎不可能。监管的缺乏一致性使美国处于岌岌可危的境地。 Without a stable framework, crypto businesses, institutional investors, and DeFi developers must navigate a system where the rules can change every few years. Navazan sees the U.S.’s failure to establish a long-term crypto strategy as one of the biggest barriers to institutional adoption. “U.S. crypto regulation is caught in a cycle of shifting policies. One administration pushes for aggressive regulation, the next rolls it back, and the cycle repeats. Without stable policy, institutional adoption of DeFi will always remain limited.” The contrast with Europe is striking. The European Union’s Markets in Crypto-Assets regulation provides a unified legal framework for crypto, offering companies clear, standardized guidelines across the region.  相比之下，美国没有单一的总体加密货币监管规定。相反，企业必须应对一个支离破碎的体系，其中 SEC、CFTC 和 IRS 等机构对合规性有不同的解释。 纳瓦赞认为，这种脱节的做法威胁到美国在数字资产领域的领导地位。 “在受监管地区运营的公司受益于简化的监管框架，这使它们能够在整个欧洲运营而无需多个许可证。这种稳定性使企业更容易规划长期战略——而这正是美国目前所缺乏的。” 在此背景下，即将于 3 月 7 日举行的白宫加密货币峰会可能至关重要。此次活动预计将聚集 Michael Saylor 和 Brian Armstrong 等行业领袖，可能会影响美国加密货币监管的下一阶段。 这场讨论能否取得有意义的进展或沦为另一种政治手段，将决定美国能否在数字金融领域占据领先地位，还是看着创新转向其他地方。