独家：斯卡拉穆奇称比特币今年将达到 20 万美元，只是“时间问题，而不是是否”

区块链分析工具 Bubblemaps 已完成其原生代币 BMT 的代币生成活动，超额认购率为 13,500%。 3 月 11 日，Bubblemaps (BMT) 结束了其 BMT 代币的 TGE，该代币托管在币安钱包上。该项目计划以每股 0.02 美元的价格出售 4000 万枚 BMT 代币（占总供应量的 4%），希望筹集 1503.42 BNB。然而，他们收到的认购总额约为 202,990 BNB，比其最初目标高出 13,500% 以上。据 Cryptorank.io 称，TGE 活动是在 Bubblemaps 最近由 INCE Capital 领投的 320 万美元融资之后进行的。 TGE 由币安钱包协助举办，这一事实引发了人们的猜测，即 BMT 可能很快会在币安交易所上市进行现货交易。目前尚不清楚 Bubblemaps 是否会在币安现货上市，但它已经在包括 MEXC、Kraken 和 Bybit 在内的几家主要交易所上线。 你可能还喜欢：What is token generation event: TGE vs ICO Bubblemaps is a blockchain analytics tool that visually represents token and NFT ownership distribution using bubble clusters. It helps detect wallet connections, hidden whales, and suspicious activity by mapping out token holdings in an intuitive and interactive way. BMT, the native token of Bubblemaps, serves as its governance and utility token, unlocking advanced analytical features within the platform. 就 BMT 代币经济学而言，BMT 的最大份额（26.3%）分配给生态系统和社区。投资者持有 24.3% 的供应量。22.2% 用于空投，以鼓励采用并奖励早期参与者。流动性分配 12.2% 以维持平稳的市场运作，而团队获得 9% 作为其贡献的补偿。最后，6% 保留用于协议开发和研发。 来源：Bubblemaps X 你可能还喜欢：2025 年五大区块链分析趋势 | 观点

Disclosure: The views and opinions expressed here belong solely to the author and do not represent the views and opinions of crypto.news’ editorial. The recent crypto market pullback may have caught many off guard, but it also did something useful—it forced the DeFi community to talk about an important topic we usually ignore in a bull market hype:risk management.  You might also like:DeFi needs more interoperability, not apps or infra | Opinion In March 2025, Hyperliquid—one of the most respected DeFi platforms—was rocked by two market manipulation events. One was a massive long position on Ethereum (ETH), the other a short play targeting a small-cap memecoin called JELLY. These trades weren’t just clever exploits; they were alarm bells ringing about the foundational weaknesses in DeFi’s risk infrastructure. Two sides of the same problem The first attack involved a trader leveraging $307 million in ETH at 50x, then strategically withdrawing collateral as the price rose to bring the position close to liquidation. When the price dipped, the forced liquidation couldn’t be absorbed by Hyperliquid’s liquidity pool (HLP) without major slippage, costing the HLP $4 million while netting the trader nearly half that in profit. Key remedies by Hyperliquid included lowering leverage limits for Bitcoin (BTC) and ETH, increasing maintenance margin requirements, and restricting collateral withdrawals to at least 20% of open positions. Weeks later, the JELLY incident happened. A trader exploited the memecoin’s low liquidity on DEXs and aggressively spot-bought while holding a short position on Hyperliquid, causing a price surge that pushed HLP into a nearly $13 million unrealized loss. In response, Hyperliquid’s validators stepped in, controversially voting to forcibly settle at a substantially lower price and delist JELLY perpetuals. The protocol dodged the loss but at the cost of its own decentralization narrative and associated risks. Both events—long and short, blue-chip and ‘shitcoin’—point to the same root problem:DeFi still largely treats risk management as an afterthought. TradFi has been there before That said, this is nothing new. Traditional finance has seen it all before through derivatives blowups, margin spirals, and rogue trades. But after each crisis, it didn’t just recover; it hardened. Position limits, capital requirements, stress testing, and other sophisticated methods became standard not because they were nice but because they were necessary. DeFi, on the other hand, in many cases continues to reward high leverage, underestimate liquidity risk, and leave governance decisions to validator votes that can be reactive and panic-induced. Nonetheless, we don’t need to become TradFi, but we do have to adopt the discipline behind its evolution. Risk isn’t the enemy—complacency is The Hyperliquid incidents have taught us some important lessons on better adherence to risk control protocols. For instance: Position caps and margin locks could have limited exposure, neutralized the ETH long, and prevented forced liquidations. Better asset listing standards would have prevented JELLY from becoming a systemic liability. Clear, enforceable delisting protocols would have avoided the governance panic that undermined trust. These aren’t burdens but basic building blocks, and they need to be embedded during protocol design, not slapped on retroactively. The truth is, most DeFi platforms are still playing catch-up on risk, often learning through painful trial and error. Yet, we can’t afford to keep stumbling from one exploit to the next, hoping users will forgive and forget. Risk in DeFi is interconnected—and amplified DeFi isn’t just one ecosystem; it’s an interconnected tangle of protocols, tokens, and cross-chain bridges, amplifying contagion risks. A failure in one area—be it smart contract risk, liquidity crunches, or governance missteps—can cascade rapidly across the entire stack. When one liquidity pool collapses, users scatter. When a governance vote looks panicky or arbitrary, institutional adoption hesitates. When a stablecoin staggers, everyone holds their breath. This isn’t just technical risk—it’s market risk, reputational risk, and increasingly, regulatory risk. Paranoia isn’t overreaction, it’s maturity Some players in the crypto circles keep seeing risk management as a brake on innovation, and that’s a mistake. The next generation of DeFi leaders won’t be those who chase the highest APYs. They’ll be the ones who build resilient protocols that can withstand volatility, manipulations, and regulatory scrutiny. Paranoia in DeFi isn’t a weakness; it’s a sign of maturity. If we want DeFi to become a serious alternative to TradFi, then we have to start considering risk in every design decision we make, and not just during post-mortems. Because when the next exploit comes—and it sure will—the only question will be whether we were prepared or just hoping for the best. Read more:Five ways to tackle security risks in crypto transactions | Opinion Hong Yea Hong Yeais the co-founder and CEO at GRVT.Hong had been a trader for a decade at Credit Suisse and Goldman Sachs, respectively, prior to co-founding GRVT in May 2022, weeks before the crypto market crash. The GRVT team aims to revolutionize financial markets by integrating blockchain technology and self-custody solutions into both TradFi and DeFi. By applying blockchain settlement and trustless risk management to centralized order book infrastructure, GRVT is transforming trading and investment while upholding traditional security controls. Hong believes this approach, starting with crypto markets, can reshape the entire financial landscape. With an international upbringing in Malaysia and Poland, followed by studying business management at Yonsei University in Korea, Hong leverages his diverse international background and strategic acumen to drive GRVT’s mission forward.

俄罗斯财政部表示，该部正在努力通过推出国家基础设施来规范加密货币，以使当地加密货币市场摆脱灰色地带。 据俄罗斯国家通讯社塔斯社报道，俄罗斯财政部副部长伊万·切别斯科夫表示，俄罗斯财政部正在加大力度将加密货币推向公众，并计划建立国家基础设施，以使该国的加密货币市场走出阴影。 “我们不仅支持这一点，而且还与央行合作。如你所知，财政部一直认为数字货币市场需要最大程度的合法化和监管。” 伊凡·切贝斯科夫 该官员还补充说，该部和俄罗斯央行已同意通过由监管机构管理的实验性法律制度实施这些变革，确保该过程“高效且不发生任何违规行为”。 “我们希望这将成为我国进一步合法化数字货币的又一步。当然，没有人谈论国内结算。我们从未支持过这一点，但从创建基础设施以便数字货币能够合法流通的角度来看，而不是像现在这样在任何‘灰色地带’中流通，我们完全支持并将继续朝着这个方向努力。” 伊凡·切贝斯科夫 你可能还喜欢：由于 Tether 冻结 2800 万美元 USDT，俄罗斯 Garantex 暂停所有业务 切贝斯科夫发表上述言论之际，俄罗斯央行已向政府提交了关于加密货币投资监管框架的提案，该框架将在一个为期三年的试验性法律制度内制定。正如 crypto.news 早些时候报道的那样，该倡议遵循了俄罗斯总统的指示，将允许特定投资者群体交易数字货币。 根据该提议，只有“特别合格”的投资者（在证券和存款上投资超过 1 亿俄罗斯卢布或年收入超过 5000 万俄罗斯卢布的投资者）才有资格参与。 阅读更多：俄罗斯财政部和央行考虑为顶级投资者试行加密货币交易

Berachain’s price has plunged to a new all-time low after the breakdown of a key support level, with the looming $2.7 billion Boyco Vaults unlock on May 6 threatening to trigger further downside pressure. Berachain (BERA) recently plunged to a new all-time low of $2.82 on May 4, marking 80% decline from its post-launch all-time high of $14.83. This also reflects a drop of approximately 68% from the most recent local peak of $8.94 on March 29. That steep and sustained sell-off from March 29 peak found a temporary relief on April 9, when buyers came in around the $3.20 level, evidenced by a large bullish candle accompanied by a spike in volume on the daily chart. This established $3.20 as a critical horizontal support zone, while resistance formed around $4.20. Source: TradingView However, on May 3, the $3.20 support was broken, with a daily close below it at around $3.14 confirming a bearish breakdown. The sell-off accelerated further on May 4, pushing the price down to its all-time low of $2.82. The price has since rebounded slightly, currently trading at $2.95. You might also like:Berachain leads in net bridge flows and TVL growth, but BERA price is still bearish Berachain‘s token has been trading well below both the EMA 20 and SMA 50 since early April, and the recent breakdown of the $3.20 support level has driven the price even further beneath these downward-sloping moving averages, reinforcing the bearish trend. RSI sits at 29, deep in the oversold zone and not yet rebounding, indicating ongoing weakness. The MACD histogram is slightly positive, but both lines are still below zero and flat, indicating negative and low momentum. ATR suggests low volatility while Bollinger Band Width is very narrow, indicating squeeze conditions—often followed by sharp moves. With the recent breakdown of a key support level and price trading below EMA 20 and SMA 50, combined with BBW squeeze conditions, a further breakdown is likely—especially with the looming $2.7 billion TVL unlock from Boyco Vaults scheduled for tomorrow, May 6. The next likely breakdown zones are the psychological levels of $2.50, then $2.00, and potentially $1.50 if the liquidity from the TVL unlock unleashes extreme sell pressure. Source: Berachain pre-deposit vaults | DuneAnalytics You might also like:BeraFi, the 1st Berachain project, shots up 270% after a string of exchange listings

据 Decrypt 报道，拉斯维加斯球馆的一名代表否认已达成任何在场馆展示 Dogwifhat 表情包硬币的协议。 这一声明与 Dogwifhat (WIF) 代币支持者的说法相矛盾 Sphere 发言人告诉 Decrypt：“我们从未与 Dogwifhat 达成过协议，我们当时的代理机构仅在去年年初进行过一次非常初步的对话。” 该发言人进一步澄清说，Dogwifhat 从来没有计划出现在 Exosphere，并表示担心该场地的名称被滥用于欺骗目的。 这是一只戴帽子的狗的故事，但一个骗子从它身上骗走了 60 万美元，并将其花在派对和婊子身上，而不是竞标比特币 https://t.co/OIwOyqM7bA pic.twitter.com/greXycbis3— Marusha (@matmatottik) 2025 年 1 月 31 日 此前，Dogwifhat 的官方 X 账户曾发布过一条现已删除的帖子，称“官方确认。Viva hat vegas”，并附上了艺术家对球体上这只表情包狗的渲染图。 该帖子的修改版本后来删除了确认信息，但保留了图片，其中手机屏幕上显示“2025 年第一季度”。 2024 年 3 月，五位组织者从 WIF 支持者那里筹集资金，资助了 Sphere 广告，将代币推高至 4.83 美元的历史新高。然而，由于活动没有实现，批评声越来越大，许多人要求退款。 你可能还喜欢：Coinbase 收购 Spindl，以提供更好的链上广告